TLDR: the FDA did both in approving Cominarty and extending the EUA. The vax if produced and labelled and distributed as Cominarty is FDA approved. Without it, it is EUA only.
Under Cominarty, Pfizer can be held liable for death or adverse reactions. Under the EUA vax, they may not. As such, there seems to be strong legal incentive for Pfizer to NOT produce or distribute Cominarty. This might explain the confusing rationale of approval, and the EUA extension. Hope this clears things up a little. Bottom line, we have Schrodinger's Vaccine that is both FDA approved and unapproved, depending on labeling.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/
TLDR: the FDA did both in approving Cominarty and extending the EUA. The vax if produced and labelled and distributed as Cominarty is FDA approved. Without it, it is EUA only.
Under Cominarty, Pfizer can be held liable for death or adverse reactions. Under the EUA vax, they may not. As such, there seems to be strong legal incentive for Pfizer to NOT produce or distribute Cominarty. This might explain the confusing rationale of approval, and the EUA extension. Hope this clears things up a little. Bottom line, we have Schrodinger's Vaccine that is both FDA approved and unapproved, depending on labeling.