Here is my understanding of the FDA's little shell game: How they approved the Pfizer Jab without actually approving the Pfizer Jab. I'd be interested in people's comments, did I get it right? - The Great Awakening

103

Here is my understanding of the FDA's little shell game: How they approved the Pfizer Jab without actually approving the Pfizer Jab. I'd be interested in people's comments, did I get it right?

posted 3 years ago by Lapstrake 3 years ago by Lapstrake +103 / -0

This is my understanding of what the FDA did.

They muddied the waters to give the appearance of giving full FDA approval to the Pfizer jab, without actually doing it.

On the same day they both extend the Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer Jab that we all know and (do not) love, and they say they have full approval of another Pfizer product called Comirnaty, which is a different product that is the same thing.

Why didn't they offer their approval for the Pfizer jab that everybody has been taking? Why only this other product with a different name?

Because along with the Emergency Use Authorization comes legal liability for Pfizer. It doesn't matter if it kills you instantly when it is injected. Your family will not be able to hold Pfizer liable.

Comirnaty does not have this legal shield for Pfizer. But Pfizer isn't worried because they have no intention of manufacturing it or giving it to anybody. They gave it a name that is very hard to remember and spell properly. It exists only to support the notion that the Pfizer jab is now FDA approved.

The FDA doesn't have to worry about the consequences of bypassing all their normal procedures, because Comirnaty will never be given to anybody.

14 comments

14 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (14)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– aoneleggedduck 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

So some clarification here: Comirnaty is the Pfizer vaccine. I know it's not clearly stated in the authorization document but there is other documentation out there which shows that Comirnaty is just the newly-released brand-name of their product, the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. It's confusing AF, but, they do refer to the same thing.

like how Acetaminophen is the medical name but Tylenol is the brand name. Same medication, two names.

permalink parent save report block reply

– Lapstrake [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Which is exactly what I said.

they have full approval of another Pfizer product called Comirnaty, which is a different product that is the same thing.

▲ 0 ▼

– nvk1 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

INCORRECT INFORMATION.

For a clear synopsis of this issue, go to the site below: Inventor of the mRNA vaccine, Dr Malone (who says no one should take this vaccine) explains: https://rumble.com/vlmd4g-pfizer-seeking-full-indemnification.html