Are they able to isolate it without having to use overlapping PCR products, and then using a computer to further generate data with just more parameters? I don’t see any live samples here that were sufficient enough to produce the required data to analyze it without having to first amplify the initial results from the collected specimen.
How about we first look at some traditional methods of actual legwork instead of just using “Modern” methods that rely on copy and past digital enhancement. Yeah, the PCRs are faster but traditional ways actually grow and culture to something that doesn’t require a simulation of data.
Plus you know, the over cycling issue those tests have..
An example of a long boring way of a different virus
But remember, CDC even said that they had no quantified virus isolates of the virus available. And that was in July of 2020, after the link you provided was posted.
Page 40
I don’t think I’m barking up any trees here, and I’m definitely not the one who is picking fights with others by flaunting ones education, while also criticizing their level of education and belittling their contributions to the discussion.
We’re all here to get answers, so I believe that we shouldn’t assume that everyone who wants additional information is trying to start beef.
The study you posted, I haven’t seen that one before, so I was just responding to it by asking for more material just in case you had other methods as well, that way I could have something to compare it to.
I’m not sure why but you got really defensive about my question, challenged the idea of there possibly being different ways to isolate it, assuming that I personally could do it better or something, and then postured in an awkward way as if the widely discussed and very controversial PCR methods used have NOTHING wrong with them. There was NOTHING wrong with the election too right?
I can’t speak for anyone else here, but your definitely not going to change MY mind by defensively questioning my reasons for asking honest questions, especially when you add sass to the statement and come across as if you’re ordering off of a menu at some VAX pass restaurant in NY. Asking me to cite my sources for WHY I have my own questions and desire for more information, really?
But anyway I did provide some sources showing that there were other ways, and that there were some things that makes me want more information and additional studies, but then you tell me that it does nothing to prove anything contrary to what you posted?
The fuck?
I wasn’t trying to prove you wrong in anything, I just figured you would maybe have MORE studies that we’re not just PCR based ones..and then you had to go all weird at the end there and say things that had absolutely nothing to do with what I was asking or saying.
All I was hoping to get was some evidence of it being isolated with basically anything other than the data digital ways. You seemed to have knowledge in the field from your other posts, so I figured you might have some additional links to other studies involving more isolation methods such as the one you posted in response to the person who wanted evidence that it was real. Guess that was too much to ask.
Are they able to isolate it without having to use overlapping PCR products, and then using a computer to further generate data with just more parameters? I don’t see any live samples here that were sufficient enough to produce the required data to analyze it without having to first amplify the initial results from the collected specimen.
How about we first look at some traditional methods of actual legwork instead of just using “Modern” methods that rely on copy and past digital enhancement. Yeah, the PCRs are faster but traditional ways actually grow and culture to something that doesn’t require a simulation of data.
Plus you know, the over cycling issue those tests have..
An example of a long boring way of a different virus
http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jpbs/papers/Vol12-issue4/Version-6/M1204067376.pdf
Here’s a few examples of methods (yes it does mention the PCR as well but we’re looking for the other methods for comparison)
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/microbiology/chapter/isolation-culture-and-identification-of-viruses/
But remember, CDC even said that they had no quantified virus isolates of the virus available. And that was in July of 2020, after the link you provided was posted. Page 40
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
And then we have that lady that FOIA the crap outta them for covid 19 and other viruses.
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-for-the-isolation-for-any-virus/
I don’t think I’m barking up any trees here, and I’m definitely not the one who is picking fights with others by flaunting ones education, while also criticizing their level of education and belittling their contributions to the discussion.
We’re all here to get answers, so I believe that we shouldn’t assume that everyone who wants additional information is trying to start beef.
The study you posted, I haven’t seen that one before, so I was just responding to it by asking for more material just in case you had other methods as well, that way I could have something to compare it to.
I’m not sure why but you got really defensive about my question, challenged the idea of there possibly being different ways to isolate it, assuming that I personally could do it better or something, and then postured in an awkward way as if the widely discussed and very controversial PCR methods used have NOTHING wrong with them. There was NOTHING wrong with the election too right?
I can’t speak for anyone else here, but your definitely not going to change MY mind by defensively questioning my reasons for asking honest questions, especially when you add sass to the statement and come across as if you’re ordering off of a menu at some VAX pass restaurant in NY. Asking me to cite my sources for WHY I have my own questions and desire for more information, really?
But anyway I did provide some sources showing that there were other ways, and that there were some things that makes me want more information and additional studies, but then you tell me that it does nothing to prove anything contrary to what you posted? The fuck? I wasn’t trying to prove you wrong in anything, I just figured you would maybe have MORE studies that we’re not just PCR based ones..and then you had to go all weird at the end there and say things that had absolutely nothing to do with what I was asking or saying.
All I was hoping to get was some evidence of it being isolated with basically anything other than the data digital ways. You seemed to have knowledge in the field from your other posts, so I figured you might have some additional links to other studies involving more isolation methods such as the one you posted in response to the person who wanted evidence that it was real. Guess that was too much to ask.