Study: ‘Major Differences’ Between Grass-Fed and Plant-Based Meat, Despite Similar Nutrition Labels
(childrenshealthdefense.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
yea the way they gauge nutrition is flawed you could take chicken cook it to a crisp and have raw chicken and they write the same nutrition on the label although one isnt bio available anymore thus cannot be absorbed nearly as easily because ur body has to like remake food in your body this is why most people are depressed their bodies are exhausted from adrenal exhaustion etc due to no nutrition giving them energy that sustains so they go to caffeine etc. Technically in a chicken stick there is protein but it has been totally destroyed its enzymes vitamins by heat minerals are destroyed the proteins become toxic and toxic byproducts of cooking are introduced (acrylamides etc) that then must be eventually detoxed. When you eat raw your body is cleaning itself out and reducing toxicity Aajonus Vonderplanitz says every two raw meals cancels out a previous cooked one so eventually you can eliminate all toxicity from a lifetime of vaccines, medicine, pesticides etc. This has always been the case throughout history but now the globalists have poisoned everything and we need raw food to heal our bodies just to be normal now.