Information warfare or Biowarfare?
(www.zephaniah.eu)
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Looks like both to me.
I guess my question is while most are acknowledging the impacts of the information war, is our leadership and population severely underestimating the existential and more immediate danger of the biological war we are currently engaged in?
Thoughts?
Assuming your biological war reference refers to the rona, then as bioweapons go it's pretty ineffective, and without the information war it would have been treated as just another variation of the flu. The injections are, IMO, a bioweapon, but without the information war they'd have never even been brought to market (at least not the way they have been and with all the hype). However, as a bioweapon, the injections aren't highly effective in the sense that their most serious effects (so far) have only occurred to those who get them, and a lot of people aren't getting them (much less than has been reported and in fact I saw some report that it's only 33% percent of the US population, which coincidentally in a post on this site the previous day I estimated at 30 to 40 percent). So, all in all, in this scenario my take is that the information war is the real problem.
However, if what you're saying is that the biological warfare of the virus and the injection are just the first step in the DS path to unleashing real biological warfare, that's a whole other discussion because various governments have been messing around with creating bioweapons for years, a thing that just because we can doesn't mean we should have. Perhaps the entire system/paradigm that we currently exist in will collapse and that will put a stop to it. One can only hope.
Getting back to what the DS may be planning, if they have something else up their sleeve that's truly deadly, why go through all the folderol, the fearmongering and locking people down and mask wearing? Why not just unleash it and be done with it?
“Why not just unleash it and be done with it?”
Because when those who choose to do evil (maybe because of how they experience the ‘rewards’ of power and control), eventually want or need even more power and control, they need to be sure that a “supply “ remains available so as not to spoil their pleasure through with total and instantaneous obliteration.
In answer to your initial question, it seems apparent, imo, that cv -19 and everything related to using bioweapons, in general, eventually cause ever increasing levels of harm to targeted populations through the endless use of fear, vaccinations, boosters, lockdowns, newer technologies, tyranny, isolation, societal divisions, death, transhumanist agendas, depopulation, etc. if the bioweaponry is not recognized as such by the population before it is too late.
Porque no los dos?
My rant:
Are we too concerned about winning the malignant information war and media disinformation campaign plaguing our economy, our social, cultural, educational and political institutions, that we have essentially neglected our opportunity to proactively oppose the obviously most devastatingly lethal event of all? Have we failed to recognize what is proving to be, in all likelihood, the most dangerous invisible enemy, by far? Are we really unaware of the true imperative and danger posed by our engagement in an ever present and exponentially deadly biological war?
Think: Is it not obvious that continuous tyrannically mandated experimental vaccines, obsessive viral testing, variants, booster shots, depopulation agendas, psychopathic elites, malignant censorship of ideas, abandonment of research of alternative treatments, and avoidance of support for natural immunity is what is ultimately going to kill us all?
IMO, Trump and his ‘supporters’ obvious lack of attention, understanding and response to the complexities and particular vulnerabilities surrounding biowarfare as well as the exponential and obsequious growth of biotechnology and bioweapons and Trump’s apparently singular focus on securing economic and military success is evidence that we are definitely NOT sufficiently understanding and opposing the more serious biological warfare threats.
What say you?