He is a scientist and considers himself well-informed, but he gets his news from mainstream sources. He is sure that there is no reputable evidence in favor of Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc., or otherwise he would have heard of it. He believes that Pfizer studied its vaccine thoroughly and that if it were dangerous it would not be being used. He feels that the way the Johnson & Johnson blood clot issue was handled indicates that if Pfizer/Moderna were also dangerous they would have been pulled.
Links I have sent him so far:
UK data showing 4x the deaths from the Delta variant in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012644/Technical_Briefing_21.pdf
Tokyo Medical Association saying they should use Ivermectin: https://twitter.com/brenontheroad/status/1429624844379824129
Pierre Kory’s twitter: https://twitter.com/PierreKory
FLCCC website: https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Following the Science video: https://rumble.com/vitcgn-following-the-science.html
Ivermectin Studies: https://c19ivermectin.com/
Vitamin D Studies: https://c19vitamind.com/
Hydroxychloroquine Studies: https://c19hcq.com/
Israeli study on the efficacy of natural immunity: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/ends-debate-israeli-study-shows-natural-immunity-13x-more-effective-vaccines-stoppin
Pfizerleak: Exposing the Pfizer manufacturing and supply agreement: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419653002818990085.html
Peruvian Ivermectin study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344469305_Real-World_Evidence_The_Case_of_Peru_Causality_between_Ivermectin_and_COVID-19_Infection_Fatality_Rate
Vladimir Zelenko’s site: https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/
I don’t think he’s ready for 9/11, but he did acknowledge that scientific data is often made up. He thinks that when it is, it is eventually caught, retracted, etc. I asked him to consider that we may be in the phase between the lie and the retraction.
That’s basically what I’m trying to do with Covid.