I haven't beat anyone who knows how to fight and is prepared to fight in 1 strike. Two strikes- all the time. Do you even fight?
To clarify a single step that leads to a strike and make them react like it was a strike, even when not unleashed is still a strike.
So yes some people have wrongly reacted and left me an opening for a one strike win, but it is still not a feint attack because if they did not defend properly I would strike them.
The enemy is most vulnerable when they think they are in control. That's when they reach to strike.
The enemy is most vulnerable when they think they are in control
Those enemy is maybe limited by the speed of conscious thought then.
That's when they reach to strike.
Moment before and after strike.Reach to sounds only "after".Wrong.
I haven't beat anyone who knows how to fight and is prepared to fight in 1 strike
Because those people would even kill you if you would begin fight. And because they know how to win without single strike. I said about fighting with 1 strike only because fight without one strike is not noticed and considered as fight.
I am not pretending to be such master of course.
To clarify a single step that leads to a strike and make them react like it was a strike, even when not unleashed is still a strike
It can be seen that way then.But only with those clarification.
So yes some people have wrongly reacted and left me an opening for a one strike win
In formal fight.Real one would never be about that. By the way what is fight for you ? Only hand2hand combat ? If yes you are too narrow-minded fren.
And:
What is those "bullshit" about winning with no strike ? It is called "situational awareness" when it is about possible dangers. I am personally not master of martial art,but I know this: real masters are aware ones,they can win a fight without a strike or with single one if they would be forced to fight. Reason why we have to fight cabal one way or another is we in majority were not aware of world around us.
Do you even fight?
That were happening to me too in physical way if you ask me about it. Do I won every time ? No. After one strike ? no,I don't said I am such master,I just repeat teaching of real masters which could be applied here,I am too learning.
I haven't beat anyone who knows how to fight and is prepared to fight in 1 strike. Two strikes- all the time. Do you even fight?
To clarify a single step that leads to a strike and make them react like it was a strike, even when not unleashed is still a strike.
So yes some people have wrongly reacted and left me an opening for a one strike win, but it is still not a feint attack because if they did not defend properly I would strike them.
The enemy is most vulnerable when they think they are in control. That's when they reach to strike.
Those enemy is maybe limited by the speed of conscious thought then.
Moment before and after strike.Reach to sounds only "after".Wrong.
Because those people would even kill you if you would begin fight. And because they know how to win without single strike. I said about fighting with 1 strike only because fight without one strike is not noticed and considered as fight.
I am not pretending to be such master of course.
It can be seen that way then.But only with those clarification.
In formal fight.Real one would never be about that. By the way what is fight for you ? Only hand2hand combat ? If yes you are too narrow-minded fren.
And:
What is those "bullshit" about winning with no strike ? It is called "situational awareness" when it is about possible dangers. I am personally not master of martial art,but I know this: real masters are aware ones,they can win a fight without a strike or with single one if they would be forced to fight. Reason why we have to fight cabal one way or another is we in majority were not aware of world around us.
That were happening to me too in physical way if you ask me about it. Do I won every time ? No. After one strike ? no,I don't said I am such master,I just repeat teaching of real masters which could be applied here,I am too learning.