The FDA approval lists Comirnaty as the officially approved shot. Although it claims this shot is interchangeable with the EUA Pfizer shot, it explicitly says that the two shots are "legally distinct". Document EVERYTHING and do not sign any waivers. This will be a lawsuit goldmine for service members who decide to get the shot if they are not given Comirnaty.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
This post is really misleading, and really should have a different title at least. (USA)
If it says COMIRNATY you can sue. It was FDA approved and has no legal immunity. BUT IT WILL NOT SAY COMIRNATY, because Comirnaty will not be legally available in the USA until 2024. They will literally bait-and-switch because the experimental Pfizer BioNTech is the same formula, it will satisfy 'vax' requirements, and it is currently available - that's what they'll provide to you.
If it does NOT say COMIRNATY, it:
A. Is experimental, not approved. B. Therefore cannot be mandated. C. Is IMMUNE from litigation. You CANNOT SUE for having participated in a 'vaccine' experiment. You can try to file a complaint with the International Criminal Court about a violation of the Nuremberg Code - some people have already attempted this with no results yet.
YOU WON'T GET COMIRNATY, you will get BioNTech and be unable to sue.
This is essentially the information in question: https://nationaltriallaw.com/can-i-sue-the-army-navy-or-air-force/
In certain circumstances, one of which is medical negligence/malpractice, military members can sue via the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). If the military mandates and administers anything other than Comirnaty, they are in violation of the Nuremberg Code and are leaving themselves wide open for lawsuits.