The FDA approval lists Comirnaty as the officially approved shot. Although it claims this shot is interchangeable with the EUA Pfizer shot, it explicitly says that the two shots are "legally distinct". Document EVERYTHING and do not sign any waivers. This will be a lawsuit goldmine for service members who decide to get the shot if they are not given Comirnaty.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
You should really read the study they're talking about yourself.
Here, I did the research for you.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529
It's a single lab that investigated a single vial that was labeled as the Pfizer vaccine.
It came from a courier, and they don't know from where. It says so at the top of the study. They cannot trace the origin or even confirm that was was in the vial was actually the COVID-19 vaccine.
Which is why they call it an aqueous suspension, rather than confirm it was a vaccine. They can't, because they don't know where the fuck this vial came from. Aqueous suspension means, "something suspended in water."
You tell me if you think that makes a strong argument that the vaccines contain graphene oxide once you've done the research.
I can't find the research this guy is claiming to cite. I was able to find that particular study based on the clip only after doing quite a bit of research work.
I'm happy to read the research papers themselves. You said you've done this research, so if you have the papers available that support the replication experiments, I'm happy to take a look.
I don't trust Pfizer to accurately market its product just on faith.
I do trust that scientists are a far more competitive and bloodthirsty group of people than you guys believe they are.
Einstein is famous because he dismantled the physics theory of one the most famous physicists in history.
Every scientist wants to be the next Einstein and dismantle some widely-accepted theory.
The ONLY scientists that would have a vested interest in protecting Pfizer's vaccine are Pfizer scientists.
The vast majority of scientists don't work for Pfizer. Or the CDC. Or any other vaccine manufacturer.
I don't accept that there's literally any way to motivate 99.99% of scientists NOT to attack the vaccine if it's literally anything other than what it claims to be. There's simply too much profit and fame to be had in dismantling the system.
Which is the opposite of what people here believe, but to each their own.