The history of somehow leaking who banks where so pressure can supposedly be bought against the bank demanding the closure of 'problematic' accounts has been happening for many years by now.
Ignoring the fact that this narrative seems to mean that terrorists like antifa seemingly have access to all banks customer records in perpetuity(!), I doubt that any of these supposed threats are real.. and its all a deepstate excuse to attack and deplatform people at any time that they want hardship imposed on.
Any business or person that doesn't toe the line? Somehow their account leaks, the bank closes the account, and now they get the message as to what happens when dissident opinions become too prominent. And other people who see this are maybe intimidated into remaining silent.
It shouldn't be anybody's business where the guy banks, so, how is it a reputational risk?
The history of somehow leaking who banks where so pressure can supposedly be bought against the bank demanding the closure of 'problematic' accounts has been happening for many years by now.
Ignoring the fact that this narrative seems to mean that terrorists like antifa seemingly have access to all banks customer records in perpetuity(!), I doubt that any of these supposed threats are real.. and its all a deepstate excuse to attack and deplatform people at any time that they want hardship imposed on.
Any business or person that doesn't toe the line? Somehow their account leaks, the bank closes the account, and now they get the message as to what happens when dissident opinions become too prominent. And other people who see this are maybe intimidated into remaining silent.
Mafia'esqe crime, but not of the type they claim.