Mike just announced it on Frankspeech
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Just out of curiosity, but what's the latest on that?
My knowledge on the situation was:
Sidney Powell had Merritt helping on her lawsuits back in November/December. Apparently he fucked up a lot of the writing and burnt that bridge.
Popped back up on David Clements after The Professor's Record caught on in early January. I listened to a couple of those and Merritt seemed a little bit knowledgeable, not per se glowie, covered a lot of the links that we saw in December between voting companies and such. Didn't really exhibit anything that made me think he's found a novel exploit before.
Everything fine until the Symposium, at which time I'm assuming Clements vouched for Merritt to be on one of Lindell's teams.
Merritt talks to reporter saying the election data was bunk. I can't really argue with that logic, as Lindell has been talking about releasing this for 8 months now, and even Lindell stated after the fact that they only brought 1 terabyte (and who knows in what actual form). They failed to pair the Dominion machine's logs up with that election data during their symposium.
They wheeled out CodeMonkeyZ who didn't bother loading registry hives, and whose best contribution from the segments I saw was "do we have anyone that knows batch programming?" Made me distrust his whole knowledge of things at that point. Granted my trust was already waning after they spent like 2-3 hours of failing to use tech properly for a virtual meetup. "Oh, he doesn't have audio again". Granted it was worth a good laugh, but I watched with the intention of hoping to see them proving shit, not proving ineptitude.
Clements disavowed Merritt shortly after the article. Some "is he white hat, is he black hat" occurred, but I pretty much stayed out of that, so don't know how the story ended. My thoughts were "he's just an idiot in a sea of idiocy saying 'I think these people are idiots'".
I will defend Merritt's stance only in that Lindell's evidence still has not been presented, proven, or released. It's still on the "needs government agency backing in order to be upheld in court" in my eyes. 36 terabytes is a lot of information, but when you know src and dest addrs, should be able to parse that from a tcp dump easily, and he failed to prove that the Colorado machine was in his packet logs and that to my knowledge would've been the only proof available (unless he's actually paired it with ASOG's unredacted Antrim report, or maybe something else exists out there).
So I imagine the lawsuit is going to be his breach of an NDA by making statements to a reporter, but that was the last thing I ever saw regarding it. I don't know what the NDA looks like, but I don't think they're going to be getting much money from that dude. Is there something else pointing towards Merritt legitimately being a bad actor/glowie and not just an idiot?
Good discussion here. IMO, jury is still out on Josh. Lindell was just on WarRoom talking about the lawsuit. I love Lindell, but on this, he struggles to make any coherent statement. They are suing Josh but he didn't know what the suit was about.
I do agree that Josh broke the NDA - I don't think there is any question about that and Josh himself seemed to admit to it. But if there was fraud going on, Josh's claim, then that is trivial. What did Josh actually do other than tell supposed lies about Lindell? I am still not clear even after listening to Lindell's taped evidence. I will tell you this, I would not trust Pete Santilli (sp).
The biggest issue I have against Josh at this point is he has not come forward and tell his side of the story and take questions. Why won't he go on with Moseder or CannCon? Moseder stood up for him and CannCon refused to trash him.
Josh is on tape admitting he stole data and broke his NDA. He was even caught in a few lies because his story was bullshit. He is the epitome of fraud.
To what end? From your comment, it sounds like Josh's motives do not matter. I disagree, I believe his motives are of significant importance. He has since went on to lie in articles about deserving the 5 million, and he doesn't even mention that he's already stated he confirmed the data came from the 2020 election. All he does is bitch about not seeing the PCAPs, most likely because he was standing by to facilitate them being poison pilled. He even tries to deny Mike was physically attacked, even though he wouldn't have any knowledge of it because he wasn't even there. So he is purposely trying to smear Mike.
So he's in bed with the fake news media, helping create false hit-pieces against Mike Lindell. Trust Pete? Who cares? The phone call recording speaks for itself.
From where I'm sitting, it looks like the deep state failed to sabotage the symposium along with Mike's data. My suspicions are confirmed by the behavior of the fake news media and their lack of coverage of anything related to the symposium, just lies and hit pieces.
I'll enjoy watching Mike destroy this deep state hack with this lawsuit. It will be hard to follow because there will be a media blackout on it.
I am not saying Josh is the white hat here. But in the absence of any real coverage of what he did and why and in the absence of any truly condemning evidence from Lindell, I am not ready to turn him into Benedict Arnold.
His phone call is evidence enough, but you said you couldn't figure it out and you don't trust Pete.
I'll catch you on the next wave of truth that hits the streets.