That there was any science supportive of mask wearing for this type of virus has been a lie from the beginning. All the priory studies showed no effect and even with good, clean masks being worn properly.
Now, after years of lying they finally have a single study that is modestly supportive of their position, and I'll be honest, I just don't trust the damn thing.
I do expect to see this study cited as the golf standard though and as soon as it's available to look at we need to familiarize ourselves with it because it'll likely show up in mask mandate legal cases. But it kinda feels like we're past resolving things in a corrupted court, eh?
That there was any science supportive of mask wearing for this type of virus has been a lie from the beginning. All the priory studies showed no effect and even with good, clean masks being worn properly.
Now, after years of lying they finally have a single study that is modestly supportive of their position, and I'll be honest, I just don't trust the damn thing.
I do expect to see this study cited as the golf standard though and as soon as it's available to look at we need to familiarize ourselves with it because it'll likely show up in mask mandate legal cases. But it kinda feels like we're past resolving things in a corrupted court, eh?
Were these priory studies carried out by monks or abbots, perchance?
<gdar>