You would think having jurors be impartial toward health companies would mandate jurors not being in the pocket of, or at the mercy of the health company defendant. So those not shot up with all sorts of random things that are ruining their immune system and biochemistry.
A judge doing the worst possible thing for impartial justice is probably an indicator the trial is a farce, and the judge is owned by the defendant or their associates.
Is the judge saying that all vaccinate jurors are unbiased and all unvaccinated are?
Discrimination in your face.
You would think having jurors be impartial toward health companies would mandate jurors not being in the pocket of, or at the mercy of the health company defendant. So those not shot up with all sorts of random things that are ruining their immune system and biochemistry.
A judge doing the worst possible thing for impartial justice is probably an indicator the trial is a farce, and the judge is owned by the defendant or their associates.
Agreed!