Using their system against them without being labelled conspiracy theorist-
Take a MSM headline, read the article, take the numbers and throw it in their faces. I guarantee you they will rage or you may spark something.
Example:
"Record 1000 cases...[in your area or close to you]....with 300 in ICU. Total tested today 20k. 800 unvaccinated 150 one dose and 50 two doses. 80% of cases unvaccinated and 80% of ICU patients unvaccinated"
Questions to ask-
- "Out of the 20k total, how many were unvaccinated? How many single dose? How many double dose?"
( In other words, what was the ratio in the total. Very important. Governments don't check (or release) this for a reason.
Example: If you take 100k people and test them, 1000 come back positive, 800 unvaxxed, 200 vaxxed. You would think you had an 80% unvaxxed rate <<- This is what governments do.
What they leave out is the obvious. What is the rate of the total (100k)?
Meaning, if 100k got tested, 80k were unvaxxed and 20k were vaxxed, we get a total of 80/20 ratio unvaxxed being tested Which in the end allows us to assume that if 50k were unvaxxed and 50k were vaxxed, we'd get a 50/50 ratio <<- government does NOT include this for obvious reasons. This single piece of data would shatter the scheme )
- "How many of that 300 in ICU are chronically ill, terminal patients? Why does this matter? If a terminal patient is dying, refuses the vaccine or is isn't provided one for obvious reasons, should they count as a covid ICU patient? Same question applies to deaths"
( In other words, give me the data on just who is in ICU and what condition they are in. Blanket data is meaningless. A healthy 30 year old and a dying 30 year old are not the same. This question is beautiful because it invalidates age as a factor and FORCES detailed answers on health/preexisting conditions/status (terminal or not) etc)
- " How many patients in these ICU/Hospitalization reports are repeat?"
(In other words, is the general population being affected or are these people repeat patients who have preexisting conditions? This data is important)
- " Can you provide the data that differentiates between a single/double dose vaccinated ICU/hospitalization/death within the 14 day period after the shot(s) and compare that to patients who were unvaccinated?"
(In other words, take out all the patients/dead from the official data that includes those recently jabbed. Inform them that the system considers a person who died/hospitalized within 14 days, after being double dosed, as an unvaccinated death/patient)
- "Name another vaccine that required 100% of the entire planet to be inoculated."
(self explanatory. Doesn't exist)
Here is the trick, they won't be able to answer any of these. The data doesn't exist or isn't released
When they can't answer you, ask them a simple question. "Why can't you find me basic data?" You aren't asking for anything complex. This is what an honest government would provide. Doesn't exist. The only entities counting the above are third party and they are very, very careful in how or when they release it and it's always buried.
There are a thousand more obvious questions you can ask but the most simple do the trick the best. I've never had anyone be able to answer any of those questions. The data doesn't exist.
Good luck!
It means, they take for example 100 people and test them then say 10% came back positive (10/100). Out of that 10, 8 of them were unvaxxed and tell the public the unvaxxed 8/10 meaning they are 8 times more likely to be positive.It's a simple manipulation.
What they leave out is the number of people in the total testing (100) who were vaccinated/unvaccinated.
Without the data that tells us just how many people were unvaccinated vs vaccinated out of that 100, the 8/10 is meaningless.
Because say 80 people out of the 100 were unvaxxed and 20 were vaxxed. Then we can conclude that IF 50 were vaxxed and 50 were unvaxxed, we'd have 50/50 ratio.
Does that make sense?
50/50 ratio would essentially mean the vaccine does nothing and if we were to test 100 people, 50 fully jabbed would almost certainly test positive.
The important thing that's happening everywhere right now is that the growth in jabbed going to hospital and dying is exploding. I posted earlier that Ontario, Canada has seen an 1100% increase in ICU admission in fully jabbed over the last 60 days and that is accounting for the growth in total people jabbed. It outpaces it by nearly 1090%!!
And that is based on government reports. Considering they don't count anyone whos been jabbed within a 14 day period of their jab, as vaccinated, the number is waaayyyyyy higher.
I'm willing to bet right now the vaccine death total is in the millions far surpassing the actual virus