Some observations:
-
I am more hesitant to post content in public spaces because I do not always have energy to do deep research needed to debunk fact-checking responses.
-
I am more cautious about what I post, as I don't enjoy being publicly shown to have made an error (which many readers will assume to have occurred if I don't reply to factcheck type criticisms)
-
As a result, I am slowing down. Sure, some things which would be in the public interest to be publicised are getting past me, but the quality of the posts I am making publicly is going up.
Ditto everything above for face to face conversations.
Basically the "fact-checking" and censorship is making me carefully double-check my conclusions before making any kind of public statement. If others are doing the same, this means that the quality of argument being presented from the side of those who question the mainstream narrative is being consistently improved and strengthened.
I think this explains the recent media debacle around Ivermectin. It is getting increasingly difficult for them to create the illusion of fact-checking, and as a result they are panicking and getting careless. This is making even more people start to pay attention. For example, my sister has started to research Ivermectin following conversation with me. (She is very trusting and has taken the Vax. All her information sources are mainstream). This weekend I was able to show her that almost everything she had read about Ivy in the mainstream is unreliable at best, and deliberately fradulent at worst. As a result I see the early signs of her beginning to question what she is being told.
So my take-away from this is, let us recognise the opportunity in the censorship, and just keep making it harder and harder for them to debunk the increasingly coherent and compelling arguments mounting against the media narrative. I still believe that Ivermectin is the key to unlocking the conspiracy around vaccines, covid, the election, and all the other malfeasance that lead up to what are increasingly looking like pre-meditated crimes.
Totally agree with you there. This video really helped me understand just what it is that people in the UK have been bombarded with and helped me start to feel protective rather than critical of those who have been most persuaded. We don't have live TV in our house, and so we skipped the entire show which might be why we were able to consider an alternative approach. All the people I know who have questioned the narrative are those who consume very little - if any - live TV. It's called programming for a reason :)
Preview YouTube video Ep.240 | Exposing the mass hypnosis being use on us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEsRp2ZrrYI
The TV in our house is rarely turned on. If it is on, the odds are good that it's just to watch a movie that we own on disk. The people that I know that have bought into the COVID_19 narrative hook, line and sinker are the ones that are always talking about the latest show, series, etc. that they've been binge watching on TV. The programming is complete with them. At the very beginning of all of this, I tried to tell them to turn off their TVs, as all of the news stations were working with the C_A. When they wouldn't even listen to this, which was easily verified, I knew they were too far gone and never attempted another red pill with them. It is this group of people that are going to be completely mind-blown in the end.
These are the people that I'm going to be there for when the SHTF. They're going to need all the help we can give them, as they'll be starting at Square Zero.