Yes,of course some cosmic radiation CAN change data in computers. But I really hope they will use that argument ? Why ? Well it was NOT about one machine anons. It was about all of them. It is physically almost IMPOSSIBLE (means probability so low like timeline with both lenin and hitler being killed in car accidents) and to have such accidents everywhere is even less probable - even in one place it would have to hit in one exact piece of RAM. Most probable result would be some computer error NOT changing election results. Maybe people like reddit mod of our critics u/ARandomOgre not knowing ever a shit about quantum physics would believe such piece of shit that it was byte flipping (If he would be knowing what it is all about XD ),but nobody who knows anything about probability would ever believe this shit. Come on,it has much lower probability to cause meaningful effect than most of proofs about Q based on twitter posts of Pompeo,Trump,etc anons post here. Hitting one exact bit on few gigabytes memory... Lol...
Earth is shielded by its atmosphere,and in space they use ECC and all the shit preventing stations and satellites from such outcomes. Probably.I don't believe people sending satellites to space are such retards to not care about that.
Defending such results of ellections by byte flipping this way is impo-fucking-sible. Simply. More probable is having car accident tomorrow.
By the way - of course it isn't so big problem in case on computers really, ECC memories cost more but are safer. However such things happen on the orbit not on earth really. You would have server working months to have this kind of error,and damaging data by such thing is so probable... lol... I am after one beer,but my mind is clear about that.Impo-fucking-sible.
I will admit that my understanding of kwantum fisix is probably not where I’d like it to be.
I also think that pretty much everyone who tries to explain anything using kwantum fisix probably doesn’t have the level of understanding they think they do, and is relying on people not having the background to effectively call bullshit.
Well you were just arguing about math in things being physics and arguing about research methods here. Funny coincidence - as on conspiracies.win u/clemaneuverers posted about higgs I would say that even if method of people here is vulnerable for confirmation bias,then at worst it is no more vulnerable than modern particle physics in CERN :D XD (Ok, people here would feel nobilitized, but only until they would realise about CERN methods XD But this is probably such for reddit users like you because people on reddit believe everything mainstream to not even check it - for example to not check how standard model verification suck)
I also think that pretty much everyone who tries to explain anything using kwantum fisix probably doesn’t have the level of understanding they think they do
And here you are wrong. Well I have some "understanding",unfortunately very basic one - what is experimentally confirmed and what is not.And it is experimentally confirmed - there is no chance that really random event would behave exactly same way many times. It is not discussion about wave function being piloted or not (anons,it is physical question not planefagging ;) ),variables hidden or not, and WTF is really entagglement (ok,here I have my common sense theory: its name is real clue what may be happening)
Hence in our last discussion related to this - by my opinion and by laws of physics that were really impossible that people here using certain methods were finding things looking like Q related done by people related to Trump administration. Of course that NOT confirms Q itself,that ONLY confirms that people related to Trump administration look like communicating within Q's "framework".
They’re going to explain the fraud with Common Core Quantum physics
Quantum physics/Standard Model is SHIT. Fake from the beginning to manipulate society over the past century. 🤮
Their problem is they don't know it well...
Yes,of course some cosmic radiation CAN change data in computers. But I really hope they will use that argument ? Why ? Well it was NOT about one machine anons. It was about all of them. It is physically almost IMPOSSIBLE (means probability so low like timeline with both lenin and hitler being killed in car accidents) and to have such accidents everywhere is even less probable - even in one place it would have to hit in one exact piece of RAM. Most probable result would be some computer error NOT changing election results. Maybe people like reddit mod of our critics u/ARandomOgre not knowing ever a shit about quantum physics would believe such piece of shit that it was byte flipping (If he would be knowing what it is all about XD ),but nobody who knows anything about probability would ever believe this shit. Come on,it has much lower probability to cause meaningful effect than most of proofs about Q based on twitter posts of Pompeo,Trump,etc anons post here. Hitting one exact bit on few gigabytes memory... Lol...
Earth is shielded by its atmosphere,and in space they use ECC and all the shit preventing stations and satellites from such outcomes. Probably.I don't believe people sending satellites to space are such retards to not care about that.
Defending such results of ellections by byte flipping this way is impo-fucking-sible. Simply. More probable is having car accident tomorrow.
By the way - of course it isn't so big problem in case on computers really, ECC memories cost more but are safer. However such things happen on the orbit not on earth really. You would have server working months to have this kind of error,and damaging data by such thing is so probable... lol... I am after one beer,but my mind is clear about that.Impo-fucking-sible.
Hey, what did I do? :)
I will admit that my understanding of kwantum fisix is probably not where I’d like it to be.
I also think that pretty much everyone who tries to explain anything using kwantum fisix probably doesn’t have the level of understanding they think they do, and is relying on people not having the background to effectively call bullshit.
Well you were just arguing about math in things being physics and arguing about research methods here. Funny coincidence - as on conspiracies.win u/clemaneuverers posted about higgs I would say that even if method of people here is vulnerable for confirmation bias,then at worst it is no more vulnerable than modern particle physics in CERN :D XD (Ok, people here would feel nobilitized, but only until they would realise about CERN methods XD But this is probably such for reddit users like you because people on reddit believe everything mainstream to not even check it - for example to not check how standard model verification suck)
And here you are wrong. Well I have some "understanding",unfortunately very basic one - what is experimentally confirmed and what is not.And it is experimentally confirmed - there is no chance that really random event would behave exactly same way many times. It is not discussion about wave function being piloted or not (anons,it is physical question not planefagging ;) ),variables hidden or not, and WTF is really entagglement (ok,here I have my common sense theory: its name is real clue what may be happening)
Hence in our last discussion related to this - by my opinion and by laws of physics that were really impossible that people here using certain methods were finding things looking like Q related done by people related to Trump administration. Of course that NOT confirms Q itself,that ONLY confirms that people related to Trump administration look like communicating within Q's "framework".