But, the report says they went to around 4000 houses, asked the people there what they thought of their vote and if they thought it was counted - the results were pretty predictable - almost everyone said they felt robbed.
They took the percentages of how people responded and made the assumption that it held true for all voters. It will be VERY easy for anyone who disagrees to point at the methodology and laugh this off.
I'm really disappointed because Ron Watkins hyped this up as the biggest truth bomb ever, and it's just a pdf everyone will ignore.
It makes me sad how the new cool thing to do is hype stuff up with a drop date and promises, then it just falls flat and vanishes.
What happened to the file trees from the dominion machines? Where's the pcaps?
Why is it just bomb after bomb after bomb with no progress, it's like we're jumping three spaces forward and falling two back every week.
"asked the people there what they thought of their vote and if they thought it was counted "
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion, because that's not what it said in the report. On the subject of missing votes they went to registered voters who had no vote showing as cast, and asked if they had voted. That's much different than asking someone if they thought their vote was counted. The methodology used is actually verifiable and statistically significant.
I'm not sure if you're dooming or shilling on purpose, or just didn't read carefully.
I read carefully, the data they used to ask questions was from 2016, so it was super out of date. So I don't know how they "went to registered voters who had no vote showing as cast" because they didn't have that date.
It's kind of a weird report too, I just read the full PDF - available here so you don't have to give all your information: https://canvass50.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maricopa-County-Canvass-Report-Final-090721.pdf
But, the report says they went to around 4000 houses, asked the people there what they thought of their vote and if they thought it was counted - the results were pretty predictable - almost everyone said they felt robbed.
They took the percentages of how people responded and made the assumption that it held true for all voters. It will be VERY easy for anyone who disagrees to point at the methodology and laugh this off.
I'm really disappointed because Ron Watkins hyped this up as the biggest truth bomb ever, and it's just a pdf everyone will ignore.
It makes me sad how the new cool thing to do is hype stuff up with a drop date and promises, then it just falls flat and vanishes.
What happened to the file trees from the dominion machines? Where's the pcaps?
Why is it just bomb after bomb after bomb with no progress, it's like we're jumping three spaces forward and falling two back every week.
"asked the people there what they thought of their vote and if they thought it was counted "
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion, because that's not what it said in the report. On the subject of missing votes they went to registered voters who had no vote showing as cast, and asked if they had voted. That's much different than asking someone if they thought their vote was counted. The methodology used is actually verifiable and statistically significant.
I'm not sure if you're dooming or shilling on purpose, or just didn't read carefully.
I read carefully, the data they used to ask questions was from 2016, so it was super out of date. So I don't know how they "went to registered voters who had no vote showing as cast" because they didn't have that date.
We need to look at things from the other side.
If a similar report came out about vaccine efficacy, Biden satisfaction, etc. We would shit all over it and it would mean nothing to us.
This study means nothing to the 8 leftists who will see it.
Very true. So this is pretty useless overall. If Tucker even mentions it, it still won't go far.
thanks for the link! also good points made, I've wondered the same