"[They] have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series."
Yet they're legally distinct?
Where do you see that Comirnaty isn't arriving until 2024? If they are (supposedly) chemically the same, how could this be true? And why do they share a legal distinction?
Where do people keep getting this claim from? Can you post some evidence of it?
I find this on the FDA's website: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/comirnaty-and-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine
That's quite interesting.
"[They] have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series."
Yet they're legally distinct?
Where do you see that Comirnaty isn't arriving until 2024? If they are (supposedly) chemically the same, how could this be true? And why do they share a legal distinction?
Thanks for the sources. I appreciate your genuine interest and dedication in this topic.