"It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?"

I know an ER doc who, in the early days of the virus, talked about symptoms he'd never seen before, especially blood clots in the lungs, which led to the use of ventilators. He acknowledged that comorbidities made a significant contribution to the patient's outcome. He initially seemed stumped by what they were seeing and later said they had to come up with a new protocol to treat it: Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and a third item, which IIRC was zinc.

I agree that Trump forced their hand, that the flu and cold were hijacked, that the media campaign created the public reaction of absolute fear and terror, and that the pandemic was simulated (hoaxed). However, based on the ER doc's experience, I believe that some new disease has been floating around, that it was likely created in a lab, that it's relatively harmless to anyone healthy, and that, just like the regular flu, it's only a significant problem for someone whose body is already debilitated by comorbidities and/or a weakened immune system. I also believe that the deaths of the relatively young and otherwise healthy who've gone to a hospital with this disease are a result of the Remdesivir and ventilator treatments being inflicted on them by corrupt practitioners at all levels of the system.

If I didn't know this ER doc, I'd probably agree with you 100%. I do agree that this has been a good discussion. 😺