I’ve heard a lot of anecdotes but haven’t seen a ton of solid data. 82% chance of miscarriage seems excessively high. As in, even the mockingbirds couldn’t hide that level. I think the rate is something like 10 or 15%, if the mother knows about it.
I see what you’re talking about. Hadn’t watched the video previously... too many videos on my watchlist. But now caught up. I remember reading the paper when it first came out.
Here’s my only quibble: there is a selective bias at play. The 700 mothers who received the vaccine in the third trimester already were selected as having had successful pregnancies up till that point. As in, there could have been a larger pool of women, some of whom already had spontaneous abortions in the first or second trimester, who were taken out of the study because they aborted prior to receiving the jab.
That then keeps the stats for abortions down, by making the denominator a much larger number in reality than that which they reported.
I’m not saying that the percentage still would have been equal to the normal reported rate of 10-26%, but it may be lower than 82% since the denominator is artificially lowered.
Again- I think it’s a terrible idea to get the jab at all due to the narrowness of the spike protein motif for which it encodes and the potential for adverse effects, especially in pregnant women.
Could the researchers really have missed such a discrepancy? Are they being malicious? Or are we missing something? I don’t know
You’re not wrong there, especially about both organizations being compromised.
I wonder if covid itself will have the same effect? The spike protein is present in both. I’ve heard much less about covid causing high rates of miscarriage or infertility but I haven’t looked very hard either. Mostly because I’ve had it and don’t want to be shooting blanks until it’s my appointed time.
I’ve heard a lot of anecdotes but haven’t seen a ton of solid data. 82% chance of miscarriage seems excessively high. As in, even the mockingbirds couldn’t hide that level. I think the rate is something like 10 or 15%, if the mother knows about it.
I see what you’re talking about. Hadn’t watched the video previously... too many videos on my watchlist. But now caught up. I remember reading the paper when it first came out.
Here’s my only quibble: there is a selective bias at play. The 700 mothers who received the vaccine in the third trimester already were selected as having had successful pregnancies up till that point. As in, there could have been a larger pool of women, some of whom already had spontaneous abortions in the first or second trimester, who were taken out of the study because they aborted prior to receiving the jab. That then keeps the stats for abortions down, by making the denominator a much larger number in reality than that which they reported. I’m not saying that the percentage still would have been equal to the normal reported rate of 10-26%, but it may be lower than 82% since the denominator is artificially lowered.
Again- I think it’s a terrible idea to get the jab at all due to the narrowness of the spike protein motif for which it encodes and the potential for adverse effects, especially in pregnant women.
Could the researchers really have missed such a discrepancy? Are they being malicious? Or are we missing something? I don’t know
You’re not wrong there, especially about both organizations being compromised.
I wonder if covid itself will have the same effect? The spike protein is present in both. I’ve heard much less about covid causing high rates of miscarriage or infertility but I haven’t looked very hard either. Mostly because I’ve had it and don’t want to be shooting blanks until it’s my appointed time.