https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFwbMmgh/anyone-remember-this-pentagon--h/c/
The number of shills making the same argument "A plane is a missile" and "I have people who actually witnessed the plane hitting the pentagon" and other reddit-style shilling makes you wonder if this was the real target ...
Ok, my take on this is the FBI actually knew about the planned attack from Bin laden himself. They then planted explosives all along the height of the towers, and timed it when the real airplanes hit. I actually lived in New York for 3 years, and was friends with several folks who actually saw the planes hit the towers. They were actually viewing from Newark, and saw AAL and the UAL planes hit the TT. WTC7 was a controlled demo, as we have learned. The Pentagon was a different story, which was most likely a missile or a kamikaze drone.
First, I have not made up my mind whether the actual commercial airliners hit the towers. There is one new footage I recently saw which makes it very unlikely, I will try and find it. Even if those airliners actually hit the buildings it was clearly piloted by some highly skilled pilots, not students who had just a couple hundred hours on a cessna. I have great doubts whether bin Laden actually had anything to do with it, more importantly, what did he gain out of it for himself or his movement.
First, they would have seen only one plane hit the building. The other one would have been from the opposite direction. Second, from Newark highly unlikely they made out the markings of AAL and UAL. But finally, you have to ask yourself, why were they watching the towers before the first plane hit? If they were just viewing the scenery for that long, then did they take any pictures?
What I find amazing is, for a post with 300 likes and a couple hundred comments, the number of first hand and second witnesses for an event that lacks organic photo evidence you would expect if there were so many witnesses!
And I do kind of understand why there's lack of photos, since it was an unexpected event. And no she wasn't viewing scenery, she was viewing it from her workspace (which points towards Manhattan).
You can dissect this anyway you want. But to be able to recognise the airliner that hit the first tower one had to be carefully following the plane before it hit the North tower from the opposite side, if you are looking at it from Newark. Infact, the plane would not have been visible at all before it hit it.
So the claim they say both the markings is clearly wrong.
Just for reference, this is how it looked from Jersey side Tell me you think one could make out the plane markings of either plane?
I kinda agree with you there, but the old UAL livery is pretty obvious from a long distance, as me and my father used to plane spot a lot at DFW and SLC. But she (the eyewitness I'm talking about) could have easily fudged the second plane and just saw it on the TV.