It was pretty cringey, but at one point he said this regarding the crash at the Pentagon:
What are you going to research? There are multiple eye witnesses to a plane crashing into the pentagon on 9/11, the flight was tracked by Air Traffic Control as out of contact with them and off track headed to Washington DC and coming down at the Pentagon, there was an explosion at the Pentagon after witnesses saw a plane flying very low overhead and clipping a street lamp before it hit the Pentagon, the passengers from that flight are all dead. You have a news reporter who in the heat of reporting what happened mistakenly said a missile hit the Pentagon. There were not witnesses to that. If you want to find the truth, don't disregard every witness and piece of evidence to it.
I replied:
Those are certainly some things I could research. How about you learn why NIST's report is no good, and I'll dig into one or two of these things.
Any of y'all have any good resources for those topics he mentioned? Or alternative explanations? It's been a while since I've humored a 9/11 Official Narrative believer, but figured maybe I'd dip into it again.
What makes these "witnesses" credible? It's entirely possible that they were FBI/CIA plants propped up to give canned answers to the press. How come the only footage released just shows a flying projectile and is only about 5 frames of animation? Where are the other camera angles? If I remember correctly, the FBI confiscated all tue other footage. Why? How tall is the pentagon? How tall was the plane that allegedly hit it? In order to leave a hole in the building the way it did, how low would it need to be and at what angle would the plane need to hit in order to leave that mark? Why was no scar left on the ground. Why are people so fucking stupid? To think, 20 years later and people still believe a bunch of jihadis with box cutters did it all on their own.