In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong
by Jon Rappoport
September 14, 2021
In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” [1] under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this:
“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.”
The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.
A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.
I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?
If you don’t have an isolated specimen of the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).
As I’ve described many times [2], “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.
Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”
This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.
Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, this is completely unproven, and therefore…
There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.
Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?
Nowhere.
And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.
It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”
A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.
It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.
one thing to consider, however, is the lack of virus isolate is intentional to hide the actual genome and prevent analysis by non-state-backed scientists who would expose the damning evidence of engineered, chimeric, gene substitutions.
you should all realize too, that gene "science" is run off computer models, calculations, and statistics; but that doesn't negate the fact that there are at least 60 P-4 labs around the world creating diabolical bioweapons with no conscience.
Almost 2 years now and they can’t actually find any of the virus that is supposedly floating around literally the entire planet at all times.
If there really was Covid isolated they could have produced traditional vaccine with dead or weakened virus over a year ago. But hey didn’t and only still push mRNA injections instead. No one can answer, why?
I have a theory. There is no COVID-19 virus. Instead, it's a bio-chemical toxin that is making people sick when it is inhaled. Part of the makeup of the bio-chemical toxin is graphene oxide (GO), a nano-particle, which is being used to carry the bio-chemical toxin. It is interesting that GO toxicity produces the same symptoms as COVID-19 does. Headaches, loss of smell and taste, low temperature, and a weakened immune system. Many people report a metallic taste when they are first poisoned by it. It is being spread through the atmosphere. One can use their imagination on how it is/was being deployed.
In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus…wrong
by Jon Rappoport
September 14, 2021
In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” [1] under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this:
“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.”
The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.
A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.
I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?
If you don’t have an isolated specimen of the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).
As I’ve described many times [2], “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.
Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”
This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.
Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, this is completely unproven, and therefore…
There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.
Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?
Nowhere.
And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.
It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”
A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.
It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.
In this case, capital crimes against humanity.
one thing to consider, however, is the lack of virus isolate is intentional to hide the actual genome and prevent analysis by non-state-backed scientists who would expose the damning evidence of engineered, chimeric, gene substitutions.
you should all realize too, that gene "science" is run off computer models, calculations, and statistics; but that doesn't negate the fact that there are at least 60 P-4 labs around the world creating diabolical bioweapons with no conscience.
Almost 2 years now and they can’t actually find any of the virus that is supposedly floating around literally the entire planet at all times.
If there really was Covid isolated they could have produced traditional vaccine with dead or weakened virus over a year ago. But hey didn’t and only still push mRNA injections instead. No one can answer, why?
I have a theory. There is no COVID-19 virus. Instead, it's a bio-chemical toxin that is making people sick when it is inhaled. Part of the makeup of the bio-chemical toxin is graphene oxide (GO), a nano-particle, which is being used to carry the bio-chemical toxin. It is interesting that GO toxicity produces the same symptoms as COVID-19 does. Headaches, loss of smell and taste, low temperature, and a weakened immune system. Many people report a metallic taste when they are first poisoned by it. It is being spread through the atmosphere. One can use their imagination on how it is/was being deployed.
I got tested a few months ago, test came back positive.
The chemical smell of the swab was the last thing I was able to smell before my sense of smell vanished completely. Taste never changed though.