He noticed me perusing this site/forum during a lunch break the other day and recognized it. Kind of a quiet guy, but seemingly a patriot type very aware of current events. He believes:
(1.) The internet was established by the MIC/Cabal as a pervasive intelligence gathering "sensor mesh" which vacuums up untold hordes of data and information. This data and information is consumed and stored by super-massive computer A.I. with the intent of establishing and maintaining a sentient world simulation which includes an avatar and profile/dossier for each one of us. (2.) Sites like this are a subset of the "social networking" pool and provide ripe pickings for A.I. monitoring of sentiment and strategic planning of policies and events. (3.) There is a keen interest in identification of and monitoring of "rugged individual" and "patriot" types who don't follow the herd and possess critical thinking. Assumedly, these "types" are threats to the narrative/cabal and would possibly be the first ones targeted for roundup if/when the SHTF and the cabal makes it's move. (4.) The wise ones who use VPN's and other mechanisms to hide their tracks when posting on social networking sites and places like this are running a fools errand because the MIC has visibility into EVERYTHING....every packet that flows across the internet.
What Say Ye?
The top of the line AI systems (publicly known) are so far aware from sentience that it's almost a joke.
Even systems that can 'read' and perform data analysis to a degree of comparable human IQ is ultimately just an input->output black box. Until these things are hooked to quantum computers, the concept of Artificial Sentience is beyond abilities.
Especially when you look into the ways in which AI's can be hacked.
EX: On computer vision networks, tests have been done that have shown how adjusting a single pixel value in the image can take an accurate detection to a completely useless one
Ex: If one knew the weighting of the network 'nodes' they could apply a visual filter that would take those values and the output would become nonsense
EX: When putting AI vs AI on a task, sometimes one AI will do something that seems useless but absolutely destroys the capacity of the other AI to react in any meaningful way
EX: After studying how an AI distinguished between a wolf and german shephard it was determined that the distinction comes to environment; wolves live in snow and shepards exist in grassy areas.
AI is something of a misnomer; they really are stupid, they are just capable of reaching stupid conclusions exponentially faster than humans.