Why ""real""?
How do we know 1/3 is hidden when we dont even know how much we dont know about physics currently? to know we're missing some then we would need to know 100% of it.
To what benefit do they bury the history of it? Most of these ""pioneers"" weren't and wouldn't take sole credit if still alive but would claim they worked with other scientists through many debates and conversations. I would listen to a concise and thorough documentary about how, why, where and when these things were actually thought of and why it means the current people that are given part of the credit dont deserve it
That is a strong claim with scant evidence and a lot of history to go through, I can listen but do not guarantee I will agree at the end of the journey
Contextually based alternative history of what actually happened and presentable documentation to validate said claim, followed with concise logical determinism based ideas of why it can't be any other way and how what is presented is propaganda and why that propaganda benefited anyone. It is difficult to dispute history which is why it must be supported with many pieces of context, logic and documentation that substantiates the claims
Why ""real""? How do we know 1/3 is hidden when we dont even know how much we dont know about physics currently? to know we're missing some then we would need to know 100% of it.
To what benefit do they bury the history of it? Most of these ""pioneers"" weren't and wouldn't take sole credit if still alive but would claim they worked with other scientists through many debates and conversations. I would listen to a concise and thorough documentary about how, why, where and when these things were actually thought of and why it means the current people that are given part of the credit dont deserve it
That is a strong claim with scant evidence and a lot of history to go through, I can listen but do not guarantee I will agree at the end of the journey
Contextually based alternative history of what actually happened and presentable documentation to validate said claim, followed with concise logical determinism based ideas of why it can't be any other way and how what is presented is propaganda and why that propaganda benefited anyone. It is difficult to dispute history which is why it must be supported with many pieces of context, logic and documentation that substantiates the claims