You know dude/dudette, sometimes you are further into left field than anyone else around here, as far as I can tell. :)
Which isn't a criticism, per se. It's just that you seem completely unsatisfied that people are largely boring and selfish, and manifest those behaviors in very predictable ways.
A boring, predictable world seems largely impossible to you. The bigger the problem seems to be, the bigger the cause MUST be. You seem unable to accept that big consequences can come from small causes.
So, in other words, you don't seem like much of a believe in chaos theory at all. The notion that a butterfly flapping its wings in Texas can cause a typhoon across the planet.
As I've said before, I do not use the term "conspiracy theorist" pejoratively. It's a person who has a theory that there is a conspiracy. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
And I have my own theories on how people tend to become "conspiracy theorists", because regardless of whether those conspiracies are proven to exist at some point or not, the same people who believe one conspiracy tend to believe in a lot of conspiracies.
I think being able to see pictures in clouds is a treasure of an ability, but it doesn't convince me that the clouds actually are forming those pictures. Just that you have an artistic mind capable of creating pictures in random data.
I'm curious, then. Do you actually have a personal deadline for this stuff? I know, nobody likes datefagging, but everyone here recognizes that Q is on a deadline of some sort, and if by November 2024 we don't see Democrats arrested and Trump back in office, then the Q plan isn't really materializing.
You don't have to tell me the details, but do you have a cutoff point in your own personal philosophy where you accept that Q isn't going to show back up? Because I can tell you I'll switch sides once I see The Storm, but that's easy for me. The Storm arriving will be loud and obvious. Arrests. Transfer of power. Gitmo. Whatever.
It's less easy and obvious to see that the Storm isn't actually coming if it's not. It's just going to be a day that you wake up and realize that you've been waiting for nothing, and everyone here at this point has to have at least entertained when that cutoff will be for them.
I used it colloquially. "Q shows back up" means the Plan comes to obvious fruition.
Maxwell walking isn't going to happen, nor should it. In a world without Q being directly meaningful (my world), I still absolutely want to see her in jail for as long as she's alive. Q is absolutely not required for her to be properly addressed.
And so as long as Maxwell is in jail, even if twenty years go by with no Democrat arrests, no fraud claims ever vindicated, Trump never returning to power, you'll still be a believer in Q and the Plan? Maxwell being imprisoned is all it takes?
I understand what you believe about this. I just think it relies a lot more on implication and faith than you believe it does.
And I really wish you'd focus on the actual message of the posts I take time to write rather than addressing two words you find to be something you can talk about tangentially.
I'm still curious whether Maxwell being released from prison is really the only "cutoff" for this plan for you. I have a hard time making sense of that, but I'm not the one who has to live with that logic and I want to understand.
You know dude/dudette, sometimes you are further into left field than anyone else around here, as far as I can tell. :)
Which isn't a criticism, per se. It's just that you seem completely unsatisfied that people are largely boring and selfish, and manifest those behaviors in very predictable ways.
A boring, predictable world seems largely impossible to you. The bigger the problem seems to be, the bigger the cause MUST be. You seem unable to accept that big consequences can come from small causes.
So, in other words, you don't seem like much of a believe in chaos theory at all. The notion that a butterfly flapping its wings in Texas can cause a typhoon across the planet.
As I've said before, I do not use the term "conspiracy theorist" pejoratively. It's a person who has a theory that there is a conspiracy. Nothing inherently wrong with that.
And I have my own theories on how people tend to become "conspiracy theorists", because regardless of whether those conspiracies are proven to exist at some point or not, the same people who believe one conspiracy tend to believe in a lot of conspiracies.
I think being able to see pictures in clouds is a treasure of an ability, but it doesn't convince me that the clouds actually are forming those pictures. Just that you have an artistic mind capable of creating pictures in random data.
I'm curious, then. Do you actually have a personal deadline for this stuff? I know, nobody likes datefagging, but everyone here recognizes that Q is on a deadline of some sort, and if by November 2024 we don't see Democrats arrested and Trump back in office, then the Q plan isn't really materializing.
You don't have to tell me the details, but do you have a cutoff point in your own personal philosophy where you accept that Q isn't going to show back up? Because I can tell you I'll switch sides once I see The Storm, but that's easy for me. The Storm arriving will be loud and obvious. Arrests. Transfer of power. Gitmo. Whatever.
It's less easy and obvious to see that the Storm isn't actually coming if it's not. It's just going to be a day that you wake up and realize that you've been waiting for nothing, and everyone here at this point has to have at least entertained when that cutoff will be for them.
I used it colloquially. "Q shows back up" means the Plan comes to obvious fruition.
Maxwell walking isn't going to happen, nor should it. In a world without Q being directly meaningful (my world), I still absolutely want to see her in jail for as long as she's alive. Q is absolutely not required for her to be properly addressed.
And so as long as Maxwell is in jail, even if twenty years go by with no Democrat arrests, no fraud claims ever vindicated, Trump never returning to power, you'll still be a believer in Q and the Plan? Maxwell being imprisoned is all it takes?
I understand what you believe about this. I just think it relies a lot more on implication and faith than you believe it does.
And I really wish you'd focus on the actual message of the posts I take time to write rather than addressing two words you find to be something you can talk about tangentially.
I'm still curious whether Maxwell being released from prison is really the only "cutoff" for this plan for you. I have a hard time making sense of that, but I'm not the one who has to live with that logic and I want to understand.