Ok, thanks. I'm afraid this is exactly of the "coincidence" variety of proof to 100% of normies.
When (and if) he knew, he could have written the things out in clear text, not just indicating relationships and writing intentionally obscure "code language".
Ok, thanks. I'm afraid this is exactly of the "coincidence" variety of proof to 100% of normies.
When (and if) he knew, he could have written the things out in clear text, not just indicating relationships and writing intentionally obscure "code language".
We who already believe need no further proofs.