It's an open forum so the data presented both for and against is not iron cast, or a smoking gun kind of thing. The information is indicative that there are people questioning the politics around vaccination. Many of the contributors were in the "We need vaccines for the rest of the world before we think of booster jabs for the wealthy" camp. However, this is still important in the fight against medical tyranny. We don't need boosters unless the data we are being told about these vaccines is wrong. In which case why have the boosters anyway?