Sadly this comment reflects the attitude that facts and truth is based on the authority of the people who are saying it.

If you don't think that this applies to the general public, you're ignorant.

You don't need to represent FDA to be speaking the truth. All the information shared here by these folks are true and based on actual statistics that cannot be disproven by anyone.

No one has said otherwise, but that doesn't change how this title is insanely misleading and is likely to make people look like idiots when sharing it if they don't do their own due diligence.

The fact that they are being allowed to share this info in an official, if only as an advisory, setting should be applauded since this makes it easy to get normies to watch it.

It's minor at best. Again, open mic session. It doesn't mean much.

I don't know what your definition of smoking gun is, but there has been smoking guns and fires in the backyards all through out the pandemic. The fact that the main stream hides the smoking gun does not mean it does not exist.

Again, if you can't see the value in stats and facts that the CDC and FDA themselves acknowledge, then you're simply ignorant.

Again, you are missing the point. Its not whether the government is acknowledging his statistics or not. Its the opportunity to allow normies to be exposed to the truth. What they do with it is up to them. They might ask "Did someone disprove these facts?" or they might ask "Did this session affect the way FDA voted?"

Normies have had access to any facts they want this entire time. The fact that they haven't gone after them is only because they trust the, "official sources." It's that simple.