Statement from Arizona State Senate President Karen Fann Maricopa County agrees to settle with Arizona State Senate
(media.greatawakening.win)
👨🏫 AUDIT AUDIT AUDIT 🛠️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Why is the Arizona state Senate negotiating a weaker outcome from a position of strength. The original agreement was already legally binding. The county was working from specious legal grounds by defying the obligations they had already acknowledged from the first agreement and which their earlier legal challenge had been struck down.
Why did the Senate choose to weaken their position with a new agreement in this way. Also, if the entire committee was not fully aware of this new arrangement prior you it being announced, how can this new agreement be negotiated in good faith?
The maricopa county board of supervisors has failed to comply with subpoenas for the routers. That's grounds for warrants for the arrest all of them immediately. There is no reason to relent on a position like this.. If they want to drag stuff out thats fine, but they should do it at their expense while behind bars - the same way any other defendant in a similar position would be expected to do.
Something tells me it wouldn't take long for birds like Jack Sellers to start singing.
They will all be singing like Chunk in the movie Goonies. They will start crying and telling about tests in 2nd grade they cheated on.
That scene involved a blender as I recall. Maybe thats a hint just where things need to go.
Username a dune reference? Nice
Nice catch!
Who is arguing for them to relent on their original position of strength?
Read what I wrote again if you thought I said otherwise.
I'm agreeing with the point you made - more so even.
What negotiating power do the board of supervisors have in this? None.
Ah well my mistake then. I saw the downvote and perceived your comment as taking a counter to a position that wasn't in my original comment. I figured the downvote was of your doing in that case.
Given you indicate no disagreement, I would suppose I'm getting drive by down votes from a user not interested in responding with counter points or in discussing whatever was found lacking in my original thoughts.
Probably settle right now or fight it in courts forever, if you ask me.
Bullshit, but I believe we have more than we need as is, but full transparency will eventually come by force.
I remember a different story, that the consequences for defying the Senate were miniscule , " putting them all behind bars, yada yada, was never an option " therefore the Senate never had a "position of strength" until they threatened cutting off millions in funding to the County.
Agreed, this is a solid loss for us.