Seriously, there is very little forensic value there, most of it being dynamic routing / NAT tables that are flushed on reboot. Maybe a static NAT rule or interface config where they could prove Penzone did in fact share LEO-sensitive data through the same box, or that Dominion had a login or made routing changes, but that's pretty thin. Maybe something to corroborate other evidence, but it's not gonna be a primary source of anything here- it doesn't keep copies of the through-the-box dataflows.
So not important... Unless of course the "router" is in fact not a router at all, but some "mystery box" that tech incompetents keep calling a router because they don't know any better.
I still don't get why the routers are "needed".
Seriously, there is very little forensic value there, most of it being dynamic routing / NAT tables that are flushed on reboot. Maybe a static NAT rule or interface config where they could prove Penzone did in fact share LEO-sensitive data through the same box, or that Dominion had a login or made routing changes, but that's pretty thin. Maybe something to corroborate other evidence, but it's not gonna be a primary source of anything here- it doesn't keep copies of the through-the-box dataflows.
So not important... Unless of course the "router" is in fact not a router at all, but some "mystery box" that tech incompetents keep calling a router because they don't know any better.