Do I understand correctly that none of these 'shots' are fully approved? And if that is the case no one can mandate, force, threaten, deny benefits to anyone refusing it?
Not even in the military? Not schools, hospitals, restaurants etc.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
The 'approval' thing is in my opinion the wrong hill to die on, since any $ from big pharma or their buddies can grease palms and wrangle approvals that are meaningless. It is useful however, as a tactic to hit your employer with if they demand vaxing, but will only be a delay tactic.
A better one is the entirely experimental nature of the 'vaccines', and the entirely unfleshed-out matrix of 'what happens with X', 'what is the longterm chance of Y' etc that are entirely unknown data points with this brand new technique.
Why should anyone throw a dice on mRNA modifications of cell surfaces formed by proteins in their body.. for a disease thats 99.99% survivable with no lingering negative sideaffects? If its plausible that a modified surface will stop COVID from binding with the cell and infecting it(the purported nature of why this is effective), is it possible that other things might also happen many of which are bad? Will blood clot on these modified surfaces that are recognized as damaged areas? Will the immune system attack their own cells modified in this way? Will the RNA cause cancers at high likelihoods of happening? Are these proteins something you can infect others with? What are long term impacts on fertility? What are impacts on pregnant women, or breastfeeding women? What are the impacts on children born to a vaxxed mother? What about blood donations, or organ donations, or bone marrow donations.. are any of these still safe from vaxed people?
No answers to these questions = no fitness for either use or purpose for the vax.