I've clued in to how he forms arguments, and he intentionally creates logical back-doors to his arguments that allow for their destruction.
That is to say, every argument he forms sounds really good and based, but he is using techniques of Sophism to undermine his own conservative talking points and hand winning debates to any of his "foes" that he's informed ahead of time.
If he truly has flipped to the good guys, I'd be happy, but for right now I'm suspicious of this push and even more suspicious that YouTube would even let him.
He's controlled opposition, and until he admits it that's how I'll treat him.
He's 100% controlled opposition. You'll never hear an original thought come from him, only regurgitating ideas from someone else.
(((They))) allow him to stay on the air as a defense against the argument that conservatives have their platforms removed.
Just as you noticed, he always leaves easily seen counterarguments in his pieces. So while he appears to be conservative, he's just framing conservative talking points in a way to let others defeat his arguments and, in turn, conservatives.
I'm wary of Shapiro.
I've clued in to how he forms arguments, and he intentionally creates logical back-doors to his arguments that allow for their destruction.
That is to say, every argument he forms sounds really good and based, but he is using techniques of Sophism to undermine his own conservative talking points and hand winning debates to any of his "foes" that he's informed ahead of time.
If he truly has flipped to the good guys, I'd be happy, but for right now I'm suspicious of this push and even more suspicious that YouTube would even let him.
He's controlled opposition, and until he admits it that's how I'll treat him.
He's 100% controlled opposition. You'll never hear an original thought come from him, only regurgitating ideas from someone else.
(((They))) allow him to stay on the air as a defense against the argument that conservatives have their platforms removed.
Just as you noticed, he always leaves easily seen counterarguments in his pieces. So while he appears to be conservative, he's just framing conservative talking points in a way to let others defeat his arguments and, in turn, conservatives.