I would suggest that anyone who reads this use some critical thinking. The first 60% is fairly good content. I don't know all of the terms, but 80% of it matches what many of the more credible doctors have put out there. There is some percentage of the CoVid-19 facts that would be debatable. So be careful using this as a factual reference.
The pure speculation section starts going into areas that most people would easily dismiss. That last 40% is such that it will turn off many people.
I spent the time reading the entire thing. I would caution that this could be viewed as opposition miss information campaign.
I would suggest that anyone who reads this use some critical thinking. The first 60% is fairly good content. I don't know all of the terms, but 80% of it matches what many of the more credible doctors have put out there. There is some percentage of the CoVid-19 facts that would be debatable. So be careful using this as a factual reference.
The pure speculation section starts going into areas that most people would easily dismiss. That last 40% is such that it will turn off many people.
I spent the time reading the entire thing. I would caution that this could be viewed as opposition miss information campaign.