Would you tolerate a bomb in your body, waiting to detonate if you deviated from the needs of society?
(media.communities.win)
đź’Š RED PILL đź’Š
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
This sounds like something encouraging people to be afraid. Are you saying we all have a bomb in our bodies that eventually lead to death? Well, duh. I never heard of anyone that lived forever.
Basic problem of morality? Come on. Genetics and theology may mix but this little “talking ball” doesn’t really mean anything that I can see.
Sorry, I don’t mean to put down the writer, but it’s a weird distraction. If there is more clarification here, feel free to educate me.
There are several creatures on Earth that can naturally live forever, or at least, until something else kills/eats them. Lobsters, for example.
The cells in our body naturally undergo a process called Apaptosis when the things mentioned in the pic happen old age/mutation/etc, that's the "time bomb" in our bodies. Quite literally.
Is it really needed? Is it good? Is it bad? That's the question posed.
Not my intent in sharing...
No, not really. The linked story is talking about the tumor suppression function built into our body. It is drawing an analogy between those tumors and what drives them, and what we can readily observe in many realms of human society. “Cheaters”, “gorging on the surplus of the body”, “rewriting the rules of the game to ensure their cheating not just continues, but grows unabated”
Look deeper, grasshopper