1.5 billion FB users had their data exposed to hackers. That number will grow; Maybe to 2 billion.
There are two legal repercussions to consider here:
- Did the hack steal only users' personal data or also FB internal information such as who was being targeted for censorship? Consider this with Zuckerberg's publicly known Democratic campaign contributions. Then the case could be made that FB is censoring on behalf of government, a clear violation of the 1st amendment. No more hiding behind loose interpretations of article 230. Regulate it.
Post 1100 - Apr 9 2018 11:16:28 (EST)
XMAS IN DC
Who is arranging the PRIVATE meetings?
MZ campaign contribution promises.
FB donations since 4.2.18?
Fresh round.
R's targeted (censorship/anti R = more $).
How to mask?
MZ personal donations?
Shell Co?
Recent stock dump?
Avoid FB public disclosure?
Track congressional intake (reported).
Keep open (+6 mo).
Loud w/ findings.
RT - how DC/swamp works.
Money talks.
Drain the swamp.
How do politicians access campaign contributions for personal use?
The "Con."
Q
- If Facebook were collecting your data illegally, and that data is later stolen, wouldn't you have legal recourse through a lawsuit?
Post 1102 - Apr 9 2018 11:55:43 (EST)
PEOPLE have POWER.
Don't forget how to PLAY.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
FB violation of YOUR PRIVACY.
FB actively TRACKING YOU.
FB reading your PRIVATE messages.
FB CENSORING (anti conservative).
More will drop.
We have it ALL.
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS are EFFECTIVE.
GLOBAL.
@Jack
You're next.
What is Jack's SECRET T-handle?
'Dummy' accounts to talk.
What you SEE is LIMITED.
Think emails (LL, HRC, HUSSEIN, etc).
Q
Note that the end of post 1100 doesn't just suggest campaign donations, but straight up personal bribery.
Kill it. All info ever put on it. All advertising gone. Never have another social site like it ever.
Lol. The deep state isn't winning tjey won't get any of that done. .public utility part is possible but Facebook needs to disappear along with everything on it.