First I received a pamphlet in the mail stating the FDA has approved a Covid vax so let's get you signed up for the jab. I called the number and asked about the FDA approved one. After a long hold they read me a long explanation from the CDC.
I asked if the FDA approved one was available. They put me on hold again and again read me a statement about how the EUA jab and FDA version are "interchangeable" so not to worry.
I told them I was needed the FDA approved and they informed me that is is FDA approved under EUA. I replied that it was still considered experimental medicine without the FDA approval.
I said that if I take the EUA jab that Pfizer cannot be held liable and that I needed to locate the FDA approved. She tried to tell me again that they are "interchangeable" I replied that I wouldn't have legal recourse if I had an adverse reaction because it was still considered experimental.
At that moment all the brain gears, levers, and wheels, all lubricated with pure CDC horse shit, stopped working in a extraordinary display of reaching the edge of their reality and the barrier between truth and cognitive dissonance. The vocal chords created a jumbled smash up sound trying to work without any signals being sent. When the clarity ended and cognitive dissonance again took hold I was asked to be put on hold again. I said that was all I needed to know and hung up.
Well worth it.
Nope. The "approval" is a EUA. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine
First paragraph:
"also." Meaning they use EUA for populations the FDA didn't approve, like teens.
Pfizer vaccine is fully FDA approved.
Not sure why that's so important to people. The FDA is not some magical place immune to the cabal.
Gotcha.
From what I understand there are two "versions" of the Pfizer vaccine with just a smidge of difference: the pre-approval one, and the one approved here (Comirnaty). This difference has had people questioning which one they are gonna get (for legal protection) and not receiving any clear answer.
I'm 100% with you here.
The argument was that the lack of FDA approval was a huge no-no when it came to legal protections, and a major sticking point about "alternative treatment" when FDA-approved "normal treatment" didn't (and IMO still doesn't) exist. I'm still on the fence about this last one, as Pfizer is coming up with a drug treatment and at this point I doubt anything coming out of Pfizer related to the treatment of COVID. This is part when the drug they are coming up with, despite being different, has a similar effect to ivermectin and the demonization of this molecule instead of praising a possibility of an effective existing and cheap drug is ridiculously apparent.