Not sure how I ended up here, but I need some eyes on this please. Firstly I do NOT believe in the CG plane theory. Too many witnesses for them to have been "added later". I do however believe they were not jet liners, but rather guided missile-drones designed to fool all of us. And fool us they did.
If you believe in CGI planes, this does a sufficient job of shooting it down:
https://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-lies-of-ace-baker.html
What I found in this as I was looking for a picture of the alleged planes was their windows. What I stumbled on was related and worth noting. I have yet to find a picture with a clear view of United 175's windows. I also find it odd that none of them were reflecting sunlight despite the plane being at an obvious angle with said windows pointed right at it.
But it gets better. In the posted "debunk" blog, I found myself analyzing some of the so called plane debris and ran into some issues.
Firstly, let's look at United 175 debris found on the roof of WTC 5:
https://login.filesanywhere.com//FS/M.aspx?v=8c6f62885da1adacb0a4
The blog claims that this vindicates the narrative. But upon initial inspection, what are some immediate concerns?
Notice anything yet? Why has the debris been tagged already? Before forensic photos? The blog also claims this is a piece of the registry number except if you look closely you will notice it's two separate pieces.
Okay maybe someone took the photo after debris had been identified, despite that being literally the opposite of how crime scene investigations work.
Now let's look at Murcian Air flight 11. Here is the alleged debris:
https://login.filesanywhere.com//FS/M.aspx?v=8c6f62885b929e76a1
And here is a photo of an AA 767 during that era (click on the second. Formatting is causing the green code bullshit to trigger):
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=American+Airlines+767+circa+2000&atb=v185-1&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fthumb%2Fe%2Fed%2F86ax_-American_Airlines_Boeing_767-323ER%253B_N362AA%2540ZRH%253B28.02.2000(5517491062).jpg%2F1200px-86ax_-American_Airlines_Boeing_767-323ER%253B_N362AA%2540ZRH%253B28.02.2000(5517491062).jpg
Now look at the top and bottom of the debris pic and compare with what it should look like.
Notice any inconsistency? Oh the white stripe on the bottom rubbed off? Fascinating, why is the blue one still there?
I have tried to find pics of flight 11, but of course they are nearly impossible to find. Same with pics of flight 175's windows before impact. If this can be debunked, then great. If not, add it to the list of 9/11 lies.
There should be no question regarding aircraft or no aircraft. It is very simple and any pilot can confirm this. An aircraft gives off a wake much like a boat does moving through water. An aircraft developed wingtip vortices the moment the nose wheel lifts off the ground. The wake is caused by a pressure differential between the upper and lower surfaces of a wing when an aircraft is in motion. Normally, the wake is invisible however, if you introduce smoke, you will see what looks like horizontal swirls extending down the flight path. There were no wingtip wake vortices produced which mean no airplanes. Cut and dry. You can’t have one without the other
We know they weren't jet liners because they flew well passed VMO with no visible structural integrity damage.
I have talked to someone who was there and watched it happen. On top of the millions of witnesses on the ground cooberting the fact there was a plane like object, the theory falls apart faster than a gluten free cookie.
You might not see drag from the wings due to the quality of the camera, but I am open to evidence provided you can find recordings using similar technology from that era.
Whatever the object was, we can definitively say an object did penetrate the towers. I think it was a missile drone... It also could have been a light exoskeleton designed for low altitude high speeds considering explosives were already placed in the buildings and the planes could have been classic misdirection entirely.
New Pearl Harbor does some great analysis.