So let me get this straight. There are people being fired without ability to claim unemployment because they will not get an approved vaccine? I don't mean to be stupid but how the heck are you going to fire thousands of people healthcare workers for refusing an FDA approved drug when the FDA approved drug is not even an option to take? The pfizer one we have now is the same formula but people are being mislead. Legally distinctive.... One you cant sue and one you can sue for bodily harm. It matters what's on the label. I may be late to the game in understanding this but I finally got the gist.
This is extremely disgustingly deceitful and I'm pretty sure this is why they push because who ever bought the vials of the what's considered experimental drugs under US law are struggling to collect their insurance money as quickly as possible before more people realize the bodily harm is no one's fault but that person. It's sick because all the information is there.
The legal distinction is legal responsibility for side effects. Under an EUA, if you get side effects, it's your problem. Under FDA approval, there are regulatory and legal mechanisms in place for establishing liability and compensation for injuries.
It's an elaborate bait and switch that wouldn't be nessesary if the jabs were safe.
So what is the deal with govenor mandates then? How do I talk my way out of that one without having to use my exemption?