If he's controlled opposition, why did Big Tech eventually have to deplatform him and the media stop giving him air time? Why wouldn't they have just controlled him?
He was losing credibility when Q called him out and the deplatforming really stopped that. People said, “If he is controlled opposition, why would they deplatform him?” He also made an effective target for that first ban because so many people said, “He is just crazy, this is fine,” and then a precedent was set that people being cancelled at that level was just a thing that happens.
I do kind of like him though, but I think he is probably blackmailed and used as a tool. The whole point of controlled opposition is they are allowed to speak some amount of truth (obvious truth) and provide a counter-narrative, but their truth also needs to be embedded with misinformation and theatrics (to discredit the true truths), and beyond that, they are also positioned to steer the counter-narrative. I notice, for example, that all the people I consider controlled opposition just love to follow everything Cortez does and create a lot of outrage about her every move. This then creates the idea that she is important and worth obsessing over, distracts us with an irrelevant target, and increases her own credibility on the left.
I'm still on the fence about all this, but feel that he's doing enough good waking people up regardless of whether or not he is actually controlled in some way.
I see a lot of parallels between him and Trump, when it comes to how they silenced them for saying things that was inconvenient to the establishments agenda, even after they had already become more tame and careful about talking about certain things.
I've seen people say he's anti-Q, but I've never seen him actually mention anything related to Q before. I don't follow him though, so I wouldn't be the best person to ask.
I also don't really think any of that is relevant to facts he exposes and the good he does do.
I've been away for awhile but didn't he shit all over the Q movement?
If he's controlled opposition, why did Big Tech eventually have to deplatform him and the media stop giving him air time? Why wouldn't they have just controlled him?
He was losing credibility when Q called him out and the deplatforming really stopped that. People said, “If he is controlled opposition, why would they deplatform him?” He also made an effective target for that first ban because so many people said, “He is just crazy, this is fine,” and then a precedent was set that people being cancelled at that level was just a thing that happens.
I do kind of like him though, but I think he is probably blackmailed and used as a tool. The whole point of controlled opposition is they are allowed to speak some amount of truth (obvious truth) and provide a counter-narrative, but their truth also needs to be embedded with misinformation and theatrics (to discredit the true truths), and beyond that, they are also positioned to steer the counter-narrative. I notice, for example, that all the people I consider controlled opposition just love to follow everything Cortez does and create a lot of outrage about her every move. This then creates the idea that she is important and worth obsessing over, distracts us with an irrelevant target, and increases her own credibility on the left.
I'm still on the fence about all this, but feel that he's doing enough good waking people up regardless of whether or not he is actually controlled in some way.
I see a lot of parallels between him and Trump, when it comes to how they silenced them for saying things that was inconvenient to the establishments agenda, even after they had already become more tame and careful about talking about certain things.
He does.
I've seen people say he's anti-Q, but I've never seen him actually mention anything related to Q before. I don't follow him though, so I wouldn't be the best person to ask.
I also don't really think any of that is relevant to facts he exposes and the good he does do.