Sign In or Create an Account
Even if they microchipped everyone they would still need constant propaganda to maintain control of their minds. And if the idea was to intentionally destroy mainstream media to build up controlled alternative media, well, that’s not working either since almost all of the alternative media is against the microchip.
It seems like a pretty insane strategy to me. How many people are closer to submission to the globalist agenda before Trump and after Trump?
Doesn’t it seem like if they had done HRC vs. Jeb! in 2016, like most people were expecting, that all the old narratives and trust in the corporate media would have continued as it had? There would have been almost no passion for either of those two and the race would have been pretty boring and controlled. And the talking heads on the news wouldn’t have turned into such clowns. A guy like Don Lemon could have easily maintained his professional on-air composure over HRC vs. Jeb!
Then say in the HRC/Jeb! world, after HRC wins, they launch Covid. How would patriots be able to counter those narratives when almost everyone still fully believes in the news? Patriots wouldn’t have anything super obvious to point to that would easily discredit the media. And there would be no MAGA leadership, so who would patriots unite under? Jeb? There wouldn’t even be a concept to unite under, like America First.
Other issues that Trump introduced, like trade with China and the open border with Mexico, weren’t even part of the conversation before Trump. And Trump was the one who called Climate Change a hoax too. Before that, conservatives were almost totally on board with climate change. I remember Rand Paul on Bill Maher’s show and Maher had him totally on the defensive about climate change. It was Trump who pinned it on China to force the Democrats on the defense on climate change.
Why would the cabal use Trump to destroy the credibility of their own media infrastructure?
Think back to 2015. Think how much trust the corporate media had then. How much credibility. Why would they intentionally ruin that?
The genders are binary. Just because a girl might prefer to wear jeans over dresses doesn’t mean gender is some spectrum. It’s a biological binary that extends to the animal kingdom. Fashion choices don’t change chromosomes.
In 2017, President Trump awarded Musk the biggest Department of Defense contract, as Kash Patel revealed on Fox. So the idea would be that Trump and the military vetted Musk at the start of Trump’s Presidency and trusted him enough to work with him.
They are also red-pilled when they try to bring their news to others and then get censored, shut down, or slandered. There is almost always this naive veil that falls away when people realize all their good leftist behavior beforehand gave them no protection to question the official globalist narrative.
Great thread. Interesting to read what we were saying a year ago too.
There might have been many millions of people who were given saline. This would explain why so many people actually appear to be fine so far.
Not you specifically but generally speaking it would be nice if lurkers would upvote more. It would help show other people that we are competitive with places like Reddit.
It’s actually strange to me that we have people here from all around the world and millions of votes for Trump, and yet a post here will often only be upvoted by maybe 35 people?
I don’t think it would work for everyone to “have a job they love” because there are so many necessary jobs that aren’t particularly loveable. Who is going to clean the bathrooms? Who is going to take out the trash? Are we to believe that it’s someone’s dream job to clean toilets?
With capitalism, you get the job you are worthy of. If you can’t get anything better than cleaning toilets, you clean toilets and try to improve your skill set so you eventually get a better job. It’s hard work, but is there any better way?
Also, even if people love their jobs, work is still work. It’s a daily grind that most people don’t always feel like doing. Take a guy who loves cars and working on cars, and that’s his job. OK, but most of his job is still going to be doing the same routine, the same repairs, and it’s eventually going to become repetitive and dull. But that’s where the money is because that’s the service people need. Maybe the guy who loves cars only wants to work on vintage restoration, but there’s only so much money in that so even the guy who loves working on cars is not going to be able to only work on the types of cars he wants.
Communists: “Workers of the world UNITE!”
Workers: “OK, we unite under MAGA!”
Communists: “Noooooooooo not like that!”
So did they avoid using pronouns throughout the article?
Non-binary isn’t a thing though so a person who thinks they are non-binary would be a good fit with such a crowd. All the alphabet people are variations on this same freak instinct that hates God and seeks to invert the natural world.
It’s also not that unexpected for a non-binary person to shoot up a gay club in the same way it’s not that unexpected for a straight person to shoot up a straight event, if any of this even happened. If the dude was unhinged and there was some gay lover’s quarrel inside the club, an unhinged person could storm out and then come back and shoot the place up. I think sometimes these “mass shootings” (if they aren’t all fake) could be a person targeting one or two people, but then once they’ve killed their target, instead of trying to get away, they start killing everyone else to go out in a “blaze of glory”. If that explains the motivation of these people, then it makes perfect sense a non-binary person would be attacking a gay club and not a straight one in the same way a high school shooter (if they aren’t all fake) will shoot up his own high school and not some random school the next county over that he never attended.
It could be, but when his team presented him with the research they did on puberty blockers, he shut it down because it connected back to Israel, and he won’t criticize Israel to such an extent he won’t even allow criticism of a single pharmaceutical company in Israel. Could he have a mental block here? Possibly, but then once he was shown the information, if he truly cared about protecting kids from these chemical pushers, why would he shut it down? He could have criticized that one company and not extended it to all of Israel or all Jewish People. Personally I think Mossad money/Jewish funding explains it better than a mental block. I mean the company is destroying the sexual organs and hormonal functioning of children. This might even be worse than straight out raping them like the Epstein Island crowd did!
Even when I agree with Fuentes on an issue, the way he presents it, my natural instinct is to want to disagree with him. Not because he offends me, but because his mannerisms and tone seems so anti-masculine. He seems like a weak, whining, petulant boy.
Also I don’t think controlled opposition has to be fully rejected, especially since we don’t ever know for certain who is who. Instead I think we monitor them for what narratives they push or what subjects they won’t pursue. Crowder, for example, told his team not to mention the pharmaceutical company that makes the puberty blockers for kids, which suggests he wants to drum up clickbait about trans kids, but doesn’t actually want to STOP trans kids. At that point I don’t think it’s possible to fully trust Crowder on this issue and we should ask, “Does this guy want us to run around in circles on this issue but never accomplish anything?” But on gun rights, he might be good, and his content on that might be worth sharing.
Sometimes that is also a tactic to guide support towards controlled opposition.
I’ve noticed that Crowder, for example, when he starts to get scolded by the right for some stupid thing he said or did, will suddenly be “under attack” by YouTube censors. Then everyone forgets the criticism and rallies around him and buys his mugs. But then he never actually seems to be censored, does he?
Tim Pool is also questionable when he says he was “swatted” by the FBI repeatedly. Apparently that’s not how it actually works, according to people I trust who have been swatted. Once the prank call is exposed and the FBI realized they were tricked into going into a false location guns blazing, they flag that address as a target for prank swatting. Then when another prank call comes in, the flag comes up in their system and instead of setting twenty guys in with body armor and machine guns, they give the address a phone call and ask if everything is okay. They don’t keep kicking in your door week after week after week. This should be common sense.
Yeah I don’t trust Fuentes. There is also a clip around 2015/2016 when he was part of Conservative Inc., seemingly being groomed as the next Shapiro, where he was shitting over Trump. Then he has a “falling out” and starts a brand called “America First”? Where he plays an exaggerated version of who the left pretends Trump supporters are? Also he seems extremely gay to me. Owen Benjamin has dug up some clips on Fuentes acting like a fruitcake with his sister - very gay mannerisms, wrist flipping, the lispy voice, hairless, effeminate.
Also BackPage, whatever that was.
Yeah I don’t think this is a product that is actually being sold and used. Not that it doesn’t exist. But how many are being sold?
There was an interview with Musk and a few other tech people on a panel at some event around 2016. The interviewer asked them all about Trump. They all answered at the same time, a chorus of negativity, except Musk, who got super giddy and said, “I love him!” But he was sort of drowned out and ignored. The clip made the rounds back then but has not been posted much since, and I’m not even sure how a person would search for it. It would be interesting to track down though. I remember Musk’s giddy enthusiasm seeming genuine and hard to fake.
Yes I think so too. But as far as the right goes, it is common to describe ISIS as Islamic terrorism without constantly adding the caveat of Muslims in Name Only. People naturally assume that when we say ISIS is Islamic and the Bloods are black and MS13 is Hispanic, we don’t mean every single person of those groups is involved. But when we say every Hollywood studio is own by Jewish people, that somehow is worse than saying the Bloods are a black street gang.
Is it not strange though that nobody feels the need to make this clarification when we say that the Bloods and the Crips are black gangs, or that MS14 is Hispanic, or that ISIS was Islamic. Nobody says the Bloods are BINOs - Blacks in Name Only - or MS13 are HINOs - Hispanics in Name Only - or that Drag Queen Story Hour are TINOs - Trans in Name Only.
There is only this one particular group who may never be thought of as a statistical demographic even though that same rule applies to no other group. Meanwhile there is much evidence that this group actively helps each other out behind the scenes, overtly black list anyone who questions their power structure, and openly identify not as your neighbors and countrymen, but as a nomadic people with tribal loyalty outside your nation.
Jewish People also don’t seem to realize that this cloak of protection against criticism is not actually going to help them now that the cattle have started communicating with each other. The noticing has started and shutting it down doesn’t seem to work anymore. What do Jewish People think will happen once all the non-Jewish people figure out that your holy book the Talmud says non-Jews are subhuman? Do you think you are going to be able to effectively persuade people that they really are subhuman cattle put on Earth to serve your tribe? I highly recommend all Jewish People start to publicly disavow the Talmud and say that non-Jews are actually just as fully human as Jewish People.
Another thing to watch out for in the media are those weird stories that nobody really follows or cares about, but they are pushed everywhere like they are this super important issue. For example, the “murder hornets”. That was back during the start of Covid and there were so many articles about “murder hornets”. But did anyone see a “murder hornet”? Was anyone worried about the “murder hornets”? And then at some point they were dropped like they never existed. That to me suggest some kind of comms. It doesn’t even make sense to me to say “this was just the corporate media generating fear over nothing for ratings” because “murder hornets” sounded so stupid, and didn’t actually generate fear. I don’t even think those articles were getting many views. Yet the media was all over it.
Someone here posted an interesting theory that “climate change” was comms for “civilian revolt”. So instead of talking about the weather, they’re actually talking about the temperature/mood of the populace. The more people are starting to revolt, the worse “climate change” is getting. And there are certain articles that seem to make more sense if you read “climate change” as “civilian revolt”.