People need to start calling out these governors/mayors etc that push these mandates for not being injected themselves. I know they will say they were but we all know they weren’t taking the same thing as the little people. If they can’t prove their DNA has been altered by injection then no one should be even considering following the unlawful (to begin with) orders.
Idk about that - there was a post on here yesterday about 'perhaps the jab has imbedded a marker' inside the bloodstream, because there is, apparently, no way to tell if antibodies are natural or caused by artificial spike protein design. Conclusion (of the article) is that there must be a permanent residue/marker left within the body as evidence of the jab. Worse, the article spoke of an eventual 'scanner' able to determine, non-invasively, if you have rec'd the jab, in order to make the paper jab cards moot. Their plan is becoming clearer, it's up to us to interrupt this.
People need to start calling out these governors/mayors etc that push these mandates for not being injected themselves. I know they will say they were but we all know they weren’t taking the same thing as the little people. If they can’t prove their DNA has been altered by injection then no one should be even considering following the unlawful (to begin with) orders.
Idk about that - there was a post on here yesterday about 'perhaps the jab has imbedded a marker' inside the bloodstream, because there is, apparently, no way to tell if antibodies are natural or caused by artificial spike protein design. Conclusion (of the article) is that there must be a permanent residue/marker left within the body as evidence of the jab. Worse, the article spoke of an eventual 'scanner' able to determine, non-invasively, if you have rec'd the jab, in order to make the paper jab cards moot. Their plan is becoming clearer, it's up to us to interrupt this.