Harkens back to that post about the one year period where you supposedly cant do anything to the occupying power in the Geneva convention or something? So is he letting everyone know repeatedly it was november 3rd because thats when the one year period ends?
Haha some of these rules seem so strange. Okay guys, we know we got conquered, we know we can take back the government anytime, BUT the piece of paper likely written and inspired by corrupt politicians says we have to wait a year before we can mount a counter insurgency. KEK.
Not sure how much I buy a lot of these one off ideas. The idea of rebuilding our system which clearly was infiltrated at EVERY SINGLE LEVEL, does not exactly seem like the strategy I would take. It only took about 100 years which really isn't long to completely destroy. (I know the corruption goes way back but from the time the Fed, social security, etc. co-opted the government it was really only about 100 years)
for years conservatives have played by the rules, what makes you think that would suddenly change? throwing in the devolution theory at it as well. I think its retarded, im a straight forward attack al the time kinda guy. But if there was truly, (which the guy in the post shared details) some wait period, JUST LIKE BERMA waited a year, maybe this is what happens. Ill take it whenever.
the bad guys wrote the rules. You do realize if this happened in january, we would be way worse off than if it happened tomorrow right? Like the % of people awake is much higher. Im not arguing, but this shits so fucking backwards nothing surprises me. But certainly a year later much more people are awake. Lets hope something happens soon
I have not read it yet but I do agree more awake now than there would have been. I just also agree that it doesn't seem like the way I would treat an occupying force. It also would have been nice if we were given a heads up that we were going to be waiting at least a year so that we didn't wonder everyday when something would happen...
Harkens back to that post about the one year period where you supposedly cant do anything to the occupying power in the Geneva convention or something? So is he letting everyone know repeatedly it was november 3rd because thats when the one year period ends?
Haha some of these rules seem so strange. Okay guys, we know we got conquered, we know we can take back the government anytime, BUT the piece of paper likely written and inspired by corrupt politicians says we have to wait a year before we can mount a counter insurgency. KEK.
Not sure how much I buy a lot of these one off ideas. The idea of rebuilding our system which clearly was infiltrated at EVERY SINGLE LEVEL, does not exactly seem like the strategy I would take. It only took about 100 years which really isn't long to completely destroy. (I know the corruption goes way back but from the time the Fed, social security, etc. co-opted the government it was really only about 100 years)
for years conservatives have played by the rules, what makes you think that would suddenly change? throwing in the devolution theory at it as well. I think its retarded, im a straight forward attack al the time kinda guy. But if there was truly, (which the guy in the post shared details) some wait period, JUST LIKE BERMA waited a year, maybe this is what happens. Ill take it whenever.
the bad guys wrote the rules. You do realize if this happened in january, we would be way worse off than if it happened tomorrow right? Like the % of people awake is much higher. Im not arguing, but this shits so fucking backwards nothing surprises me. But certainly a year later much more people are awake. Lets hope something happens soon
I have not read it yet but I do agree more awake now than there would have been. I just also agree that it doesn't seem like the way I would treat an occupying force. It also would have been nice if we were given a heads up that we were going to be waiting at least a year so that we didn't wonder everyday when something would happen...
I cant take this shit much longer.