They say the source code to the app is entirely proprietary.
So either they're lying out their asses, which would be very strange considering how obvious it is that this kind of thing will be scrutinized more than any other website ever in the past, or the website they claim to have found on a domain is either 1) entirely fake, and the screenshots are fabricated or 2) a placeholder/early demo for early investors completely unrelated to the actual product.
We're debating source code license violations, which are 'enforced' by a non-elected non-profit; while we have no border, Congress is full of insider trading, Maricopa openly deleted election data in the face of a subpoena, and Big Pharma are active serial killers. What, even, is law?
You might as well say "we're fixing a minor pothole in a residential street when we have no border wall?" It's two completely separate functions of government.
My first guess FAKE NEWS, am I right?
If they pulled code from an Affero General Public License project they're legally required to abide by that license.
The license is the license. If they don't like the terms they need to remove the code and write their own.
They'll lose in court if they're in violation of the license.
Fun possible twist: maybe they intend to open source the code.
They say the source code to the app is entirely proprietary.
So either they're lying out their asses, which would be very strange considering how obvious it is that this kind of thing will be scrutinized more than any other website ever in the past, or the website they claim to have found on a domain is either 1) entirely fake, and the screenshots are fabricated or 2) a placeholder/early demo for early investors completely unrelated to the actual product.
We're debating source code license violations, which are 'enforced' by a non-elected non-profit; while we have no border, Congress is full of insider trading, Maricopa openly deleted election data in the face of a subpoena, and Big Pharma are active serial killers. What, even, is law?
They're enforced through civil suits.
You might as well say "we're fixing a minor pothole in a residential street when we have no border wall?" It's two completely separate functions of government.