One guy tweets, some "journalist" writes an article about it, then all the other journalists pile on and write their own articles, all citing each other.
They do this shit all the time. It's so tiring.
There's a huge chance that this whole thing is just a fabrication. That they just fabricated screenshots of the site they "found."
But, even if it's not, there's an even bigger chance that this has nothing to do with the final product. For all we know, it was just a placeholder, or a demo for an early investor presentation.
It's very strange that the media is speaking so matter-of-factly on this as if they somehow know this is true and the current version of the yet-to-be-released product. The Wikipedia page is even more ridiculous in this regard.
One guy tweets, some "journalist" writes an article about it, then all the other journalists pile on and write their own articles, all citing each other.
They do this shit all the time. It's so tiring.
There's a huge chance that this whole thing is just a fabrication. That they just fabricated screenshots of the site they "found."
But, even if it's not, there's an even bigger chance that this has nothing to do with the final product. For all we know, it was just a placeholder, or a demo for an early investor presentation.
It's very strange that the media is speaking so matter-of-factly on this as if they somehow know this is true and the current version of the yet-to-be-released product. The Wikipedia page is even more ridiculous in this regard.
TL;DR fake news