Misleading post. The union prop handler that was in charge of the weapon was forced of the set early in the day due to a complaint that was registered by a group of support staff about the lax safety protocols that the production had. They were all replaced with non union scabs hours before the incident. This post is an unfair accusation against this person.
Misleading post. The union prop handler that was in charge of the weapon was forced of the set early in the day due to a complaint that was registered by a group of support staff about the lax safety protocols that the production had. They were all replaced with non union scabs hours before the incident. This post is an unfair accusation against this person.
There's nothing misleading she has been confirmed as the Armorer. Whether or not she was actually there is another matter entirely.
Perhaps OP should have said it differently... if/when it established she was on set or on/at the location.
When I read it, it didn't strike me that way. She was the responsible party/Armorer, but was not the person who handed Baldwin the revolver.