I believe what I know to be true. And the proof is all around me. That there are general biological differences does not change the fact that 1) women do not all look alike and 2) many women have masculine features. I've known more women than I can count who looked as such. Perhaps to some degree even myself with my athletic build and a face that would never earn the adjective soft nor delicate. It's not debatable, bud
So now you've moved from facial features to pelvis. So what? I may have a broader pelvis but have an athletic slender build with no hips. You sound like a kid with little in the way of actual life experience. Dude, you're assumptions are wrong. Accept it
Look, if you want to be one of those ones who say that gender and sex are functions solely of the mind and feelings and in no way connected to biology, that's up to you to do so.
You're wrong and deluded but that's your choice.
You can tell male and female skeletons apart with some telltale signs - shape of the pelvis, broadness of the shoulders, angle of the jaw, size of the skull, a brow ridge which causes the male eyes to appear more recessed, limb length, hip to shoulder proportions, head to shoulder proportions.
No one is saying that any given female can't have one or two male skeletal markers or vice versa but if you have them all then guess what?
Here is P!NK the singer. Just face it - Pink is a male. Look at the adonis belt, strong shoulders. You KNOW in your heart of hearts you are looking at a male.
I believe what I know to be true. And the proof is all around me. That there are general biological differences does not change the fact that 1) women do not all look alike and 2) many women have masculine features. I've known more women than I can count who looked as such. Perhaps to some degree even myself with my athletic build and a face that would never earn the adjective soft nor delicate. It's not debatable, bud
I agree that some women have masculine features but every woman has a broader pelvis than their male counterparts.
Facts which cannot be denied and cannot be ignored.
Biology matters.
So now you've moved from facial features to pelvis. So what? I may have a broader pelvis but have an athletic slender build with no hips. You sound like a kid with little in the way of actual life experience. Dude, you're assumptions are wrong. Accept it
they're not mutually exclusive.
Look, if you want to be one of those ones who say that gender and sex are functions solely of the mind and feelings and in no way connected to biology, that's up to you to do so.
You're wrong and deluded but that's your choice.
You can tell male and female skeletons apart with some telltale signs - shape of the pelvis, broadness of the shoulders, angle of the jaw, size of the skull, a brow ridge which causes the male eyes to appear more recessed, limb length, hip to shoulder proportions, head to shoulder proportions.
No one is saying that any given female can't have one or two male skeletal markers or vice versa but if you have them all then guess what?
Here is P!NK the singer. Just face it - Pink is a male. Look at the adonis belt, strong shoulders. You KNOW in your heart of hearts you are looking at a male.
https://s-i.huffpost.com/gen/1009090/images/o-PINK-BIKINI-PHOTOS-facebook.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c5/97/1d/c5971df87fb11442418bfaa9e8fa937f.jpg
Just accept the truth. Pink is actually a secret trans
https://www.hawtcelebs.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/pink-in-bikini-at-a-beach-in-tulum-02-27-2019-6.jpg