Who knows but I'm one of those women without hips so you're just going to have to accept it. All my life. Tall, slender. Athletic build. Small bust, no hips. And in my 59 yrs I've known many women who look like I do
I believe you. But still, you will have undeniable female markers. Like your ratios will still be feminine, and your belly button will still be below your waist for instance - because you are female. whereas a male counterparts belly button is level with or above his waist.
Yet you have decided these people are trans based on incomplete info. They may have undeniable female markers that you simply can't see in your photos/videos
You are losing people because of your insistence that you are right in your assessments despite not being privy to all the info necessary to know for sure.
Oh and that body builder? She's a body builder.working out like a mad woman and more than likely taking who knows what to look like that. Bad example imo
Also... nothing is exactly anything when it comes to the human body. So while it may be true that men are more likely to X and women are more likely to Y... nothing is set in stone. There are always ranges of normal. And then... not everyone falls within normal.
I don't see evidence of some glaringly different skeletal structure in that photo. I've known women to look that way (sans those big muscles) Again, I don't know that you have the life experience to make these judgements. In other words... I'm not sure you've seen enough real women.
Who knows but I'm one of those women without hips so you're just going to have to accept it. All my life. Tall, slender. Athletic build. Small bust, no hips. And in my 59 yrs I've known many women who look like I do
I believe you. But still, you will have undeniable female markers. Like your ratios will still be feminine, and your belly button will still be below your waist for instance - because you are female. whereas a male counterparts belly button is level with or above his waist.
An athletic female is not equivalent to a male. Now, you need to look beyond the smoothness and the makeup and the superficial feminisation but here is a fitness model called Jamie Eason. Looking past the paintwork, the superficiality, are you looking at an athletic female body, or an athletic trans body? https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-QKE2hscyw5o/TfrH-SpnhHI/AAAAAAAAAL0/Z8qR6PEa_ys/s1600/jamie-eason-bikini-58.jpg
Yet you have decided these people are trans based on incomplete info. They may have undeniable female markers that you simply can't see in your photos/videos
You are losing people because of your insistence that you are right in your assessments despite not being privy to all the info necessary to know for sure.
Oh and that body builder? She's a body builder.working out like a mad woman and more than likely taking who knows what to look like that. Bad example imo
Also... nothing is exactly anything when it comes to the human body. So while it may be true that men are more likely to X and women are more likely to Y... nothing is set in stone. There are always ranges of normal. And then... not everyone falls within normal.
You can take all the drugs you like to be a bodybuilder but you cannot exercise or medicate your way into a different skeletal structure.
I don't see evidence of some glaringly different skeletal structure in that photo. I've known women to look that way (sans those big muscles) Again, I don't know that you have the life experience to make these judgements. In other words... I'm not sure you've seen enough real women.