Many are afraid to contribute for fear of saying the wrong thing. This group isnt always welcoming...and loves to point out everything that is wrong with anyone who they think isn't as smart as they believe themselves to be.
It is the self-sealing quality that Sunstein wrote about. Remember, he wrote that the US government should cognitively infiltrate places where conspiracy theories flourish (like the chans, and this place now I guess) and steer them into supporting the actions of government.
The question is: is Q benevolent or a Sunstein-led infiltrative PsyOp designed to dupe those who are naturally and rightly sceptical of their government into supporting their governments actions.
That is what should be heartily discussed. For a start, anons are practically salivating at the thought of being put under military rule - but only because Q has led them into it. And Sunsteins whole shtick was to lead these communities by weaponising their own tendencies against them. Not to oppose them but to become their leader and to steer them off a cliff.
And there is simply no denying that the globalists/communitarians have had really little pushback in the scheme of things. They DO march inexorably on, despite all the sassy memes.
Anons look at Myanmar and Sudan and think great things are happening. Perhaps they are, but it absolutely warrants objective and critical scrutiny.
The Great Reset itself also wants to overthrow democracy does it not? Couldn’t Qs “military is the only way” not also be taken to mean that the only way global communism could ever be imposed is through the jackboot and rifle?
Seems so in Aus.
FBI Anon, CIA Anon, WH Insider Anon. What were they? Isn’t Q just the refinement, the final form, of those prototypes?
Q appears to want a lot of the same goals as the globalists. “We are going to show you a brave new world”
Ominous, and choc full of meaning yet left undiscussed, undebated, unresearched.
Many are afraid to contribute for fear of saying the wrong thing. This group isnt always welcoming...and loves to point out everything that is wrong with anyone who they think isn't as smart as they believe themselves to be.
This is precisely as Sunstein wrote and why his paper should be required reading for everyone.
https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=760122118067098095098090125087067011060032009009023085005125123125009119025113030092041103027101109063041079112025025121019007050069029073037025070118087022121001093006084083083024124118102094029070119087067090076004106069106122097007000100095103066&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE
It is the self-sealing quality that Sunstein wrote about. Remember, he wrote that the US government should cognitively infiltrate places where conspiracy theories flourish (like the chans, and this place now I guess) and steer them into supporting the actions of government.
The question is: is Q benevolent or a Sunstein-led infiltrative PsyOp designed to dupe those who are naturally and rightly sceptical of their government into supporting their governments actions.
That is what should be heartily discussed. For a start, anons are practically salivating at the thought of being put under military rule - but only because Q has led them into it. And Sunsteins whole shtick was to lead these communities by weaponising their own tendencies against them. Not to oppose them but to become their leader and to steer them off a cliff.
And there is simply no denying that the globalists/communitarians have had really little pushback in the scheme of things. They DO march inexorably on, despite all the sassy memes.
Anons look at Myanmar and Sudan and think great things are happening. Perhaps they are, but it absolutely warrants objective and critical scrutiny.
The Great Reset itself also wants to overthrow democracy does it not? Couldn’t Qs “military is the only way” not also be taken to mean that the only way global communism could ever be imposed is through the jackboot and rifle?
Seems so in Aus.
FBI Anon, CIA Anon, WH Insider Anon. What were they? Isn’t Q just the refinement, the final form, of those prototypes?
Q appears to want a lot of the same goals as the globalists. “We are going to show you a brave new world”
Ominous, and choc full of meaning yet left undiscussed, undebated, unresearched.