While many Italian communists were looked down on by their more strident marxist comrades in other countries, there was one Italian who, while in prison for being a marxist, authored two volumes which in essence said, "Instead of attacking the West head-on, we need to identify and infiltrate Western institutions and culture which make her strong". Gramsci advocated a decades long assault on the traditional family unit -- feminisation of the family, homosexuality and disordered forms of sexuality, which over time led to pornography, contraception, divorce, and eventually abortion. His blueprint, in kernel form, suggested infiltrating the churches, schools and universities, media, art, and entertainment, and government institutions.
Waves of initially covert "agents of change" were sent Westward -- into the seminaries and universities, as a perverse "leaven" -- not to lift society but to degrade and weaken it. Initial agents lifted each other into rising positions of influence, identifying and recruiting allies (whether gullible or intelligent -- both could be used), and spread their ideas and recruits like mushroom spores, to any institutions they could infiltrate.
Some in the West caught on and attempted to warn and to put a stop to this -- the term McCarthyism was coined to direct ridicule, coming from Hollywood and the media, against anyone daring to call out communist sympathizers and supporters.
At present time, one could say those embracing Gramsci's strategies have succeeded, perhaps even beyond what levels they might have imagined -- the West teeters now at the precipice, the last bulwark against a worldwide onslaught of diabolical evil, seeking to enslave and control mankind.
In this great battle against the DS and their marxist battering ram, and even at this late point, it is helpful to know some of the origins of what our Western culture -- our families and institutions, have faced and are facing.
A bit of sauce:
I already explained what I've read that he wrote. It's analysis of motives and behavior and their origins in relationships between political society, family hierarchy, and property. Im gonna say no. Subvert is an interpretation from reactionaries clinging to the exact programming he dissects very brilliantly, where adult workers are childish dupes seeking attaboys from the thieves and decievers who squeeze them from every angle.
Lol you could just read it, it's free and a PDF now
Subvert means to overturn the current order.
No amount of extraneous waffle will make it otherwise.
You just don’t want to admit it
Im saying i never got into any methodology Maybe it's there, i never read the whole thing but in the many chapters i did read i found no actionable advice or plan, just thoroughly intelligent analysis of class relationships and how good boy little doggies suck rulers dicks bc of their daddy issues basically.
You're living it now, the malady he diagnoses is all around you and probably also on your own personality
It is you who have been indoctrinated into an ideology.
Marxism is an extreme ideology and you have to be as an ostrich with their head in the sand not to acknowledge the massive evil it has caused in the world.
The offspring of Marxism, such as Gramscis ideas, are from the same root. Evil.
The scholarship of the economic side is professionally co-opted from the inception, but the impulse to fight against rich conspirators is good and righteous and is hijacked by the cabal. Same as our patriotism is used to kill shepherds in some gorge.
Gramsci is like, "why aren't their fighting men on our side?" And then why, the social factors and how the force of political society corrupts and molds fighting and working men away from their interests
Lol the thread is "know your enemy" and youre like, "you're an enemy, and none of them ever for reasons of decency and bravery ever did or thought anything good or useful."